BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12369208)

  • 21. Automated external defibrillator program does not impair cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation in the public access defibrillation trial.
    Hedges JR; Sehra R; Van Zile JW; Anton AR; Bosken LA; O'Connor RE; Moore R; Powell JL; McBurnie MA;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jun; 13(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 16636357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
    Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The "chain of survival" concept: how it can save lives.
    Cummins RO
    Heart Dis Stroke; 1992; 1(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1344085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [What do we actually know about out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?].
    Katz E; Metzger JT; Jaussi A; Schläpfer J; Fromer M; Fishmann D; Kappenberger L
    Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Mar; 1(9):628-30, 632-3. PubMed ID: 15813340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automated external defibrillators, Part 1. Introduction and rationale.
    Malamed SF
    Dent Today; 2003 Jun; 22(6):106-11. PubMed ID: 12847851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Teaching public access defibrillation to lay volunteers--a professional health care provider is not a more effective instructor than a trained lay person.
    Castrén M; Nurmi J; Laakso JP; Kinnunen A; Backman R; Niemi-Murola L
    Resuscitation; 2004 Dec; 63(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 15582766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness of lay responder defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Nichol G; Huszti E; Birnbaum A; Mahoney B; Weisfeldt M; Travers A; Christenson J; Kuntz K;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 54(2):226-35.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19321228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest.
    Edelson DP; Abella BS; Kramer-Johansen J; Wik L; Myklebust H; Barry AM; Merchant RM; Hoek TL; Steen PA; Becker LB
    Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 16982127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Post-shock chest compression delays with automated external defibrillator use.
    Berg MD; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Kern KB; Berg RA
    Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15733755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early defibrillation.
    Domanovits H; Sterz F; Janata K; Stühlinger G; Kürkciyan I; Laggner AN
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():306-8. PubMed ID: 9421056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Legal aspects in early defibrillation by trained lay respondents].
    Weinlich M; Hölzer H; Flesch I; Domres B
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2000 Jun; 52(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 10853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adverse events associated with lay emergency response programs: the public access defibrillation trial experience.
    Peberdy MA; Ottingham LV; Groh WJ; Hedges J; Terndrup TE; Pirrallo RG; Mann NC; Sehra R;
    Resuscitation; 2006 Jul; 70(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16784998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?
    Rea TD; Shah S; Kudenchuk PJ; Copass MK; Cobb LA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16046942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Early defibrillation: where are we?].
    Trappe HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Mar; 130(12):685-8. PubMed ID: 15776352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Providing automated external defibrillators to urban police officers in addition to a fire department rapid defibrillation program is not effective.
    Sayre MR; Evans J; White LJ; Brennan TD
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 15964123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
    Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated external defibrillation: is survival only a shock away?
    Schwartz B; Verbeek PR
    CMAJ; 2000 Feb; 162(4):533-4. PubMed ID: 10701391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The need for separate analyses of survival for "in-home" arrests versus "out-of-home" arrests in the determination of whether it is best to shock first or perform 3 min of CPR before the first defibrillation; in patients with ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest when the ambulance response time is greater than 5 min.
    Rottenberg EM
    Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 19185410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The prevention of sudden cardiac death: the role of the automated external defibrillator.
    Mitchell LB
    Can J Cardiol; 2005 May; 21 Suppl A():41A-46A. PubMed ID: 15953944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated external versus blind manual defibrillation by untrained lay rescuers.
    Fromm RE; Varon J
    Resuscitation; 1997 Jan; 33(3):219-21. PubMed ID: 9044494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.