These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12371675)

  • 1. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex.
    Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m in male patients with schizophrenia.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Nowak H; Sauer H
    J Psychiatr Res; 2000; 34(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 10867120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects sequential activation of isofrequency bands in human auditory cortex.
    Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Jin CY; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1681-8. PubMed ID: 12948797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
    Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system.
    Nakasato N; Fujita S; Seki K; Kawamura T; Matani A; Tamura I; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 94(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7536153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maturational change of parallel auditory processing in school-aged children revealed by simultaneous recording of magnetic and electric cortical responses.
    Takeshita K; Nagamine T; Thuy DH; Satow T; Matsuhashi M; Yamamoto J; Takayama M; Fujiwara N; Shibasaki H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Sep; 113(9):1470-84. PubMed ID: 12169330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of interaural time differences on middle-latency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields.
    McEvoy L; Mäkelä JP; Hämäläinen M; Hari R
    Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 78(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 7982817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insights on the Neuromagnetic Representation of Temporal Asymmetry in Human Auditory Cortex.
    Tabas A; Siebert A; Supek S; Pressnitzer D; Balaguer-Ballester E; Rupp A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153947. PubMed ID: 27096960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1998 Oct; 9(14):3265-9. PubMed ID: 9831462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.