These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12372355)

  • 1. Visual field asymmetries and allocation of attention in visual scenes.
    Rhodes DL; Robertson LC
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Oct; 50(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 12372355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local processing as a function of stimulus exposure duration.
    Evert DL; Kmen M
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Feb; 51(1):115-42. PubMed ID: 12633593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries.
    Mondor TA; Bryden MP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Apr; 44(3):529-55. PubMed ID: 1631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateral asymmetries in attentional priming during a semantic and a visuospatial task.
    Declerck C; De Brabander B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):623-32. PubMed ID: 11453184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral asymmetries in visual perception: a review of tachistoscopic visual half-field studies.
    Pirozzolo FJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 1):695-701. PubMed ID: 600617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a causal relation exist between the functional hemispheric asymmetries of visual processing subsystems?
    Andresen DR; Marsolek CJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov; 59(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 16157436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual field asymmetries in object individuation.
    Harris IM; Wong C; Andrews S
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():194-206. PubMed ID: 26433638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing.
    Barthélémy S; Boulinguez P
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 133(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 12048178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of reference frames on asymmetries in Troxler's effect.
    Barrett JJ; Mennemeier MS; Chatterjee A; Fuhr PS; Novack TA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 11883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional hemispheric asymmetries of global/local processing mirrored by the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Martens U; Hübner R
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 23246827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Covert orienting biases in scene-based reference frames: orientation priming and visual field differences.
    Robertson LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Aug; 21(4):707-18. PubMed ID: 7643044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of opposing lateral visuospatial asymmetries in the upper and lower visual fields.
    Loughnane GM; Shanley JP; Lalor EC; O'Connell RG
    Cortex; 2015 Feb; 63():220-31. PubMed ID: 25282061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of visual-field asymmetries: Nine replication studies investigating lateralization of visual information processing.
    Brederoo SG; Nieuwenstein MR; Cornelissen FW; Lorist MM
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():100-126. PubMed ID: 30472383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional deployment in visual half-field tasks: the effect of cue position on word naming latency.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Nov; 53(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 14607163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric differences in stop task performance.
    Van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Mar; 112(3):279-95. PubMed ID: 12595151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP.
    Holländer A; Corballis MC; Hamm JP
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15488903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.