These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12373432)

  • 1. Improved multiparameter models of drug effects on response rate under multiple variable interval schedules: evidence from rat studies.
    González FA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):310-8. PubMed ID: 12373432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opioid-induced response-rate decrements in pigeons responding under variable-interval schedules: reinforcement mechanisms.
    Egli M; Schaal DW; Thompson T; Cleary J
    Behav Pharmacol; 1992 Dec; 3(6):581-591. PubMed ID: 11224159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.
    McClure GY; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1368-80. PubMed ID: 9190873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuing implications of the early evidence against the drive-reduction hypothesis of the behavioral effects of drugs.
    McMillan DE; Katz JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):251-64. PubMed ID: 12373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varying reinforcer duration produces behavioral interactions during multiple schedules.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):83-100. PubMed ID: 15110911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.
    Anderson KG; Velkey AJ; Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):319-26. PubMed ID: 12373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules.
    Wearden JH; Lejeune H
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):77-87. PubMed ID: 16307848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antidepressant effects assessed using behavior maintained under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) operant schedule.
    O'Donnell JM; Marek GJ; Seiden LS
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2005; 29(4-5):785-98. PubMed ID: 15893376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching law analysis of rats' alcohol self-administration in a free-operant choice procedure.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Shahan TA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 19(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 18622184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral momentum of cocaine self-administration: effects of frequency of reinforcement on resistance to extinction.
    Quick SL; Shahan TA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 20(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 19571742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.
    Whitaker S; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of fixed-time and contingent schedules of negative reinforcement on compliance and aberrant behavior.
    Reed GK; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Barretto A; Andelman MS
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 15668078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-stage model for concurrent sequences.
    Schneider SM
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):429-41. PubMed ID: 18400419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Second-order schedules of drug self-administration in animals.
    Schindler CW; Panlilio LV; Goldberg SR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):327-44. PubMed ID: 12373434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response allocation in a rapid-acquisition concurrent-chains procedure: effects of overall terminal-link duration.
    Christensen DR; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 19429217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.