218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12374151)
1. Restraining the paternalism of attorneys and families in end-of-life decision-making while recognizing that patients want more than just autonomy.
Bellard LM
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2001; 14(3):803-22. PubMed ID: 12374151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients.
Krupp AN
West VA Law Rev; 1998; 101(1):99-128. PubMed ID: 12774805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision making by surrogates.
Day LJ
Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11873744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Decisionmaking at the end of life: patients with Alzheimer's or other dementias.
Francis LP
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):539-92. PubMed ID: 15119319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Precommitment: a misguided strategy for securing death with dignity.
Dresser R
Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1823-47. PubMed ID: 15478265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Appointing a proxy for research consent after one develops dementia: the need for further study.
Kim SY; Kieburtz K
Neurology; 2006 May; 66(9):1298-9. PubMed ID: 16682657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond autonomy: diversifying end-of-life decision-making approaches to serve patients and families.
Winzelberg GS; Hanson LC; Tulsky JA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Jun; 53(6):1046-50. PubMed ID: 15935032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician-patient relations: no more models.
Clarke G; Hall RT; Rosencrance G
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(2):W16-9. PubMed ID: 15186675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care representative consent legislation.
Falk TC
Willamette Law Rev; 1990; 26(2):299-343. PubMed ID: 16047453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Brain trauma and surrogate decision making: dogmas, challenges, and response.
Nelson JL; Frader J
J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):264-76. PubMed ID: 15830555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rethinking the Patient Self Determination Act: implementation without effectiveness.
Collins SE
J Nurs Law; 1999 Nov; 6(3):29-46. PubMed ID: 16285128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
Swidler RN
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should families make health care decisions?
Glover JJ
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1158-72. PubMed ID: 12599349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new Uniform Health Care Decisions Act: paving a health care decisions superhighway?
Sabatino CP
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1238-54. PubMed ID: 12599353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preserving patient dignity when surrogates step in.
Gold MF
Provider; 2004 Jul; 30(7):28-9, 31-2, 35-7 passim. PubMed ID: 15354549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A model integrated advance directive for health care unto the third generation.
Weisbard AJ
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):2-12. PubMed ID: 11759721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical surrogacy mediation: expanding patient, family, and physician rights and reformulating the Virginia Health Care Decisions Act.
Moore DJ
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2003; 10(3):410-44. PubMed ID: 15744904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making.
Ho A
Scand J Caring Sci; 2008 Mar; 22(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 18269432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconsidering surrogate decision making: Aristotelianism and Confucianism on ideal human relations.
Fan R
Philos East West; 2002 Jul; 52(3):346-72. PubMed ID: 15156879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
