334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12374181)
1. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. University later admits that regulations were not followed.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court refuses to interfere with institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):8. PubMed ID: 14603945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
Saver RS
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems.
Puglisi T
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are new laws needed to protect human subjects?
Zucker C
Account Res; 2001; 8(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 12481767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. University failed to have adequate IRB policies and procedures in place.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Mar; 17(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 12408153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects.
Wheeler DL
Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review board (IRB) violated numerous regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12530381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional review boards and financial conflicts of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12374174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
