148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12374334)
1. Optimal excitation wavelengths for discrimination of cervical neoplasia.
Chang SK; Follen M; Malpica A; Utzinger U; Staerkel G; Cox D; Atkinson EN; MacAulay C; Richards-Kortum R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Oct; 49(10):1102-11. PubMed ID: 12374334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears.
Recio FO; Sahai Srivastava BI; Wong C; Hempling RE; Eltabbakh GH; Piver MS
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9641214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spectroscopic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in vivo using laser-induced fluorescence spectra at multiple excitation wavelengths.
Ramanujam N; Mitchell MF; Mahadevan A; Thomsen S; Malpica A; Wright T; Atkinson N; Richards-Kortum R
Lasers Surg Med; 1996; 19(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 8836997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polymerase chain reaction-assisted evaluation of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology and reappraisal of the Bethesda System.
Kühler-Obbarius C; Milde-Langosch K; Löning T; Stegner HE
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 8091897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the atypical cytologic smear. Validity of the 1991 Bethesda System.
Widra EA; Dookhan D; Jordan A; McCue P; Bibbo M; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1994 Sep; 39(9):682-4. PubMed ID: 7807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. p16(INK4a) as a complementary marker of high-grade intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. I: Experience with squamous lesions in 189 consecutive cervical biopsies.
Dray M; Russell P; Dalrymple C; Wallman N; Angus G; Leong A; Carter J; Cheerala B
Pathology; 2005 Apr; 37(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 16028838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined significance cytology: a prospective study.
Wensveen C; Kagie M; Veldhuizen R; De Groot C; Denny L; Zwinderman K; Trimbos B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Sep; 82(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 12911453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluorescence spectroscopy for diagnostic differentiation in uteri's cervix biopsies with cervical/vaginal atypical cytology.
Rodero AB; Silveira L; Rodero DA; Racanicchi R; Pacheco MT
J Fluoresc; 2008 Sep; 18(5):979-85. PubMed ID: 18363079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Highly differentiated keratinizing squamous cell cancer of the cervix: a rare, locally aggressive tumor not associated with human papillomavirus or squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Morrison C; Catania F; Wakely P; Nuovo GJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2001 Oct; 25(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 11688467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical precancer detection using a multivariate statistical algorithm based on laser-induced fluorescence spectra at multiple excitation wavelengths.
Ramanujam N; Mitchell MF; Mahadevan-Jansen A; Thomsen SL; Staerkel G; Malpica A; Wright T; Atkinson N; Richards-Kortum R
Photochem Photobiol; 1996 Oct; 64(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 8863480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical fluorescence of normal women.
Brookner CK; Utzinger U; Staerkel G; Richards-Kortum R; Mitchell MF
Lasers Surg Med; 1999; 24(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 10037349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Performance of computer-assisted imaging system in detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion of uterine cervix].
Gao YZ; Huo YL; Sun HX; Qi YF; Wang JO; Lü QJ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 42(8):543-6. PubMed ID: 24246921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities.
Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between atypical colposcopy findings and detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the uterine cervix.
Perovic M; Berisavac M; Kuljic-Kapulica N; Jovanovic T
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11876390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The significance of marked nuclear atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Fadare O; Rodriguez R
Hum Pathol; 2009 Oct; 40(10):1487-93. PubMed ID: 19540559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid assay and repeated cervical cytologic examination in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Cervical Disease Study Group of the American Foundation for AIDS Research Community Based Clinical Trials Network.
Cohn JA; Gagnon S; Spence MR; Harrison DD; Kluzak TR; Langenberg P; Brinson C; Stein A; Hellinger J;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 11228481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
