109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12374378)
21. Head scatter modelling for irregular field shaping and beam intensity modulation.
Hounsell AR; Wilkinson JM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Sep; 42(9):1737-49. PubMed ID: 9308080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of beam blocking on linac head scatter factors.
Yu MK; Sloboda RS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(2):465-8. PubMed ID: 9069322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization and evaluation of an integrated quality monitoring system for online quality assurance of external beam radiation therapy.
Hoffman D; Chung E; Hess C; Stern R; Benedict S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28291937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design of a digital beam attenuation system for computed tomography. Part II. Performance study and initial results.
Szczykutowicz TP; Mistretta CA
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021906. PubMed ID: 23387754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A dosimetric comparison of copper and Cerrobend electron inserts.
Rusk BD; Carver RL; Gibbons JP; Hogstrom KR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):245–261. PubMed ID: 27685126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators.
Ahnesjö A; Weber L; Nilsson P
Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1711-20. PubMed ID: 8587523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The separation of the head and phantom scatter components from a phase space description.
Sanz DE; Nelli FE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4259-75. PubMed ID: 15509064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of compensator and imaging geometry on the distribution of x-ray scatter in CBCT.
Bootsma GJ; Verhaegen F; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):897-914. PubMed ID: 21452727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of beam hardening and photon scatter by brass compensator for IMRT.
Hashimoto S; Karasawa K; Fujita Y; Miyashita H; Chang W; Kawachi T; Katayose T; Kobayashi N; Kunieda E; Saitoh H
J Radiat Res; 2012 Nov; 53(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 22915779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical note: on cerrobend shielding for 18-22 MeV electron beams.
Wojcicka JB; Yankelevich R; Werner BL; Lasher DE
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4625-9. PubMed ID: 18975708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Scattered photons produced by beam-modifying filters.
Huang PH; Chin LM; Bjärngard BE
Med Phys; 1986; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 3951410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of EDR2 film dosimetry in compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Srivastava RP; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N449-57. PubMed ID: 17881795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Method for estimating the intensity of scattered radiation using a scatter generation model.
Honda M; Kikuchi K; Komatsu K
Med Phys; 1991; 18(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 2046608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of numerically produced compensators.
Thompson H; Evans MD; Fallone BG
Med Dosim; 1999; 24(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 10100166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation interaction parameters of dosimetric importance for some commonly used compensators in IMRT using Monte Carlo simulation code.
Kumar A; Kaur R; Dong MG; Sayyed MI; Tekin HO
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1321-1343. PubMed ID: 30113314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Separation of dose-gradient effect from beam-hardening effect on wedge factors in photon fields.
Kalend AM; Wu A; Yoder V; Maitz A
Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):701-4. PubMed ID: 2120559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A model of primary and scattered photon fluence for mammographic x-ray image quantification.
Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6541-70. PubMed ID: 23010667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monte Carlo calculation of effective attenuation coefficients for various compensator materials.
du Plessis FC; Willemse CA
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2537-44. PubMed ID: 14528976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of central-axis doses for high-energy x rays.
Bjärngard BE; Vadash P
Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1191-5. PubMed ID: 7565394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
