250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12374912)
41. Does laterally rotated flap design influence the short-term periodontal status of second molars and postoperative discomfort after partially impacted third molar surgery?
Korkmaz YT; Mollaoglu N; Ozmeriç N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1031-41. PubMed ID: 25872465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the effects of guided tissue regeneration using resorbable membranes after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Aimetti M; Pigella E; Romano F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Feb; 27(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17370662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Radiographic assessment of impacted mandibular third molar sockets filled with composite xenogenic bone graft.
Munhoz EA; Ferreira Junior O; Yaedu RY; Granjeiro JM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):371-5. PubMed ID: 16940486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Healing following GTR treatment of bone defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars after surgical removal of impacted 3rd molars.
Karapataki S; Hugoson A; Kugelberg CF
J Clin Periodontol; 2000 May; 27(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 10847536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Ma Z; Xu G; Yang C; Xie Q; Shen Y; Zhang S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparative study on the extractions of partially impacted mandibular third molars with or without a buccal flap: a prospective study.
Kim HR; Choi BH; Engelke W; Serrano D; Xuan F; Mo DY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):966-70. PubMed ID: 20678841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Use of lincomycin-impregnated demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the periodontal defect after third molar surgery.
Tabrizi R; Khorshidi H; Shahidi S; Gholami M; Kalbasi S; Khayati A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 72(5):850-7. PubMed ID: 24560173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Can autologous platelet-rich plasma gel enhance healing after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars?
Ogundipe OK; Ugboko VI; Owotade FJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 69(9):2305-10. PubMed ID: 21550158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar: an indication for the prophylactic removal of third molar teeth? Update.
McArdle LW; McDonald F; Jones J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 52(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 24314915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Radiologic variables of clinical significance in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Santamaria J; Arteagoitia I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Nov; 84(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 9394375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Repeatability and accuracy of a paralleling technique for radiographic evaluation of distal bone healing after impacted third molar surgery.
Inocêncio Faria A; Gallas Torreira M; López Ratón M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):78022535. PubMed ID: 22752321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A splitmouth clinical trial].
Cao C; Wang F; Wang EB; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 32071470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of different grafting materials for treatment of bone defect distal to the molar in canine.
Ge J; Yang C; Wang Y; Zheng J; Hua H; Zhu J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):444-454. PubMed ID: 29577595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accidental displacement of impacted maxillary and mandibular third molars.
Durmus E; Dolanmaz D; Kucukkolbsi H; Mutlu N
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):375-7. PubMed ID: 15130077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans.
Lovelace TB; Mellonig JT; Meffert RM; Jones AA; Nummikoski PV; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):1027-35. PubMed ID: 9776031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs.
Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Martins MC; Zenóbio EG; Spolidoro LC; Marcantonio E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18783409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months.
Artzi Z; Tal H; Dayan D
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):1015-23. PubMed ID: 10914806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Potential for Osseous Regeneration of Platelet-Rich Fibrin-A Comparative Study in Mandibular Third Molar Impaction Sockets.
Varghese MP; Manuel S; Kumar L K S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 75(7):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 28249808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Attachment levels and crevicular depths at the distal of mandibular second molars following removal of adjacent third molars.
Osborne WH; Snyder AJ; Tempel TR
J Periodontol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 7038088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Modified alveolar ridge preservation to promote the osteogenesis of the distal surface of second molar after mandibular impacted third molar extraction: a preliminary study.
Lu Y; Wang Y; Chai Y; Chen M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Oct; 27(10):6089-6096. PubMed ID: 37610460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
