BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12374997)

  • 1. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.
    Mathiowetz V
    Occup Ther Int; 2002; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12374997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of hand dynamometers in elderly people.
    Guerra RS; Amaral TF
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2009 Dec; 13(10):907-12. PubMed ID: 19924352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength.
    Rolsted SK; Andersen KD; Dandanell G; Dall CH; Zilmer CK; Bülow K; Kristensen MT
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101692. PubMed ID: 38705572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer.
    Shechtman O; Gestewitz L; Kimble C
    J Hand Ther; 2005; 18(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 16059855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge.
    King TI
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 23791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.
    Kanauchi Y; Murase T; Nishiwaki M; Odagiri M; Wanezaki Y; Ishikawa H
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2023 Oct; 28(5):562-572. PubMed ID: 37881817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability and validity of the Tekdyne hand dynamometer: Part II.
    Stephens JL; Pratt N; Michlovitz S
    J Hand Ther; 1996; 9(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 8664934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.
    Huang L; Liu Y; Lin T; Hou L; Song Q; Ge N; Yue J
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 35840905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.
    Kim M; Shinkai S
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Nov; 17(11):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 28517036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Jamar and Bodygrip Dynamometers for Handgrip Strength Measurement.
    Guerra RS; Amaral TF; Sousa AS; Fonseca I; Pichel F; Restivo MT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1931-1940. PubMed ID: 28640771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.
    Vermeulen J; Neyens JC; Spreeuwenberg MD; van Rossum E; Hewson DJ; de Witte LP
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2015; 38(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 25594521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three hand dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of the measurements.
    Amaral JF; Mancini M; Novo Júnior JM
    Rev Bras Fisioter; 2012 Jun; 16(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 22801514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer.
    Hamilton GF; McDonald C; Chenier TC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 16(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 18796752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times?
    Magni N; Olds M; McLaine S
    Hand Ther; 2023 Mar; 28(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 37904810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Grip Strength Measurements by Widely Used Three Dynamometers in Outpatients Aged 60 Years and Over.
    Savas S; Kilavuz A; Kayhan Koçak FÖ; Cavdar S
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jun; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.
    Cildan Uysal S; Tonak HA; Kitis A
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 41(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 35283336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modernising grip dynamometry: Inter-instrument reliability between GripAble and Jamar.
    Mutalib SA; Mace M; Seager C; Burdet E; Mathiowetz V; Goldsmith N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):80. PubMed ID: 35073887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of psychometric properties between the Labin, a new electronic dynamometer, and the Jamar: Preliminary results in healthy subjects.
    Conforto I; Samir C; Chausse F; Goldstein A; Pereira B; Coudeyre E
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 38(5):293-297. PubMed ID: 31386926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System's Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population.
    Bellace JV; Healy D; Besser MP; Byron T; Hohman L
    J Hand Ther; 2000; 13(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10718222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength.
    Du W; Cornett KMD; Donlevy GA; Burns J; McKay MJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 38544123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.