BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12375084)

  • 1. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders' perceptions.
    Burger J
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 12375084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
    Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency among methods of assessing concerns about the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Jan; 66(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 12653023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: comparison of attitudes about Hanford Site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
    Burger J; Sanchez J; Roush D; Gochfeld M
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Apr; 61(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 11383101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual indicators of environmental health, future land use, and stewardship.
    Burger J; Myers O; Boring CS; Dixon C; Jeitner JC; Leonard J; Lord C; McMahon M; Ramos R; Shukla S; Gochfeld M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003 Dec; 89(3):285-303. PubMed ID: 14632095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recreational rates and future land-use preferences for four Department of Energy sites: consistency despite demographic and geographical differences.
    Burger J
    Environ Res; 2004 Jun; 95(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 15147927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
    Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment methods for concerns about contaminated sites.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Jan; 67(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 14668110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stewardship and future land use at a Department of Energy site: does self-interest determine ratings?
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2001 Jul; 63(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 11471868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk concerns, land use, stewardship, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: attitudes of the Shoshone-Bannock and other American Indians.
    Burger J; Roush DE; Ramos R; Gochfeld M
    Environ Res; 2000 Jul; 83(3):298-310. PubMed ID: 10944074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
    Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pollution, contamination and future land use at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Shukla S; Jeitner C; Ramos R; Tsipoura N; Donio M
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 55(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 18446260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: long-term stewardship at the department of energy.
    Burger J
    Environ Manage; 2000 Nov; 26(5):469-78. PubMed ID: 10982725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Policy characterization of ecosystem management.
    Lamont A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):5-18. PubMed ID: 16502036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative off-site impacts of ecological restoration: understanding and addressing the conflict.
    Buckley MC; Crone EE
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1118-24. PubMed ID: 18759779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
    Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding and managing human threats to the coastal marine environment.
    Crain CM; Halpern BS; Beck MW; Kappel CV
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():39-62. PubMed ID: 19432644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. International environmental law and global public health.
    Schirnding Yv; Onzivu W; Adede AO
    Bull World Health Organ; 2002; 80(12):970-4. PubMed ID: 12571726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.