BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12375683)

  • 1. Does nifedipine prevent the tachysystole associated with misoprostol induction?
    Chao A; El-Sayed YY; Sapugay AM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Apr; 11(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 12375683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterocervical laceration during induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol in a woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
    Singh BM; Kriplani A; Bhatla N
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 16147707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
    Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
    Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of misoprostol and ricinus oil meal for cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Wang L; Shi C; Yang G
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 32(11):666-8. PubMed ID: 9639767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse events following misoprostol induction of labor.
    Wagner M
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (71):9-12. PubMed ID: 15536927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?
    Stewart RD; Bleich AT; Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 207(4):290.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22901710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus.
    Weeks A; Alfirevic Z; Faúndes A; Hofmeyr GJ; Safar P; Wing D
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Dec; 99 Suppl 2():S194-7. PubMed ID: 17961564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cytotec: an effective drug for the induction of labor].
    Milchev N; Kuzmanov B; Terzhumanov R
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 12858483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uterine anomalies, induction of labor, and uterine rupture.
    Nahum GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 2):1150-2. PubMed ID: 16260550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol after prior cesarean delivery.
    Aboulfalah A; Chraibi T; el Mouatacim K; Samouh N; Himmi A
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2001 Aug; 5(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 12471923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the route of administration of misoprostol make a difference? The uterotonic effect and side effects of misoprostol given by different routes after vaginal delivery.
    Chong YS; Chua S; Shen L; Arulkumaran S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15063959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
    Cheng SY; Chen TC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
    Jouatte F; Subtil D; Marquis P; Plennevaux JL; Puech F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.