260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12375823)
1. Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media.
Szymanowski H; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3313-30. PubMed ID: 12375823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.
Westerly DC; Mo X; Tomé WA; Mackie TR; DeLuca PM
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061706. PubMed ID: 23718585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
Soukup M; Fippel M; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5089-104. PubMed ID: 16237243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy.
Fuchs H; Strobele J; Schreiner T; Hirtl A; Georg D
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6726-37. PubMed ID: 23127066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GPU-based fast pencil beam algorithm for proton therapy.
Fujimoto R; Kurihara T; Nagamine Y
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 56(5):1319-28. PubMed ID: 21297243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity modulated irradiation of a thorax phantom: comparisons between measurements, Monte Carlo calculations and pencil beam calculations.
Laub WU; Bakai A; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jun; 46(6):1695-706. PubMed ID: 11419628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fred: a GPU-accelerated fast-Monte Carlo code for rapid treatment plan recalculation in ion beam therapy.
Schiavi A; Senzacqua M; Pioli S; Mairani A; Magro G; Molinelli S; Ciocca M; Battistoni G; Patera V
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7482-7504. PubMed ID: 28873069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental assessment of proton dose calculation accuracy in inhomogeneous media.
Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Orban de Xivry J; Lee JA; Traneus E; Souris K; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
Phys Med; 2017 Jun; 38():10-15. PubMed ID: 28610689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
