These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12376437)
41. [Prediction of the pressure ulcer development in elderly women using the Braden scale]. Blümel JE; Tirado K; Schiele C; Schönffeldt G; Sarrá S Rev Med Chil; 2004 May; 132(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15279146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Pressure ulcers in intensive care: assessment of risk and prevention measures]. Aizpitarte Pegenaute E; García de Galdiano Fernández A; Zugazagoitia Ciarrusta N; Margall Coscojuela MA; Asiain Erro MC Enferm Intensiva; 2005; 16(4):153-63. PubMed ID: 16324543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records. Jin Y; Piao J; Lee SM Res Nurs Health; 2015 Apr; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 25556557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical and epidemiologic evaluation of pressure ulcers in patients at a university hospital in Turkey. Leblebici B; Turhan N; Adam M; Akman MN J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 17667087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. O'Tuathail C; Taqi R Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. PubMed ID: 21471902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Validity of the Braden Scale in grading pressure ulcers in trauma and burn patients. Griswold LH; Griffin RL; Swain T; Kerby JD J Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 219():151-157. PubMed ID: 29078875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Validation of the interRAI Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale in Acute Care Hospitals. Xie H; Peel NM; Hirdes JP; Poss JW; Gray LC J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Jun; 64(6):1324-8. PubMed ID: 27321613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Validation of EMINA and EVARUCI scales for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers in critical patients]. Roca-Biosca A; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Chacon-Garcés S; Rubio-Rico L; Olona-Cabases M; Anguera-Saperas L; Garcia-Grau N; Tuset-Garijo G; de Molina-Fernández I; Velasco-Guillen MC Enferm Intensiva; 2015; 26(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25600461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice. Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of a protocol for prevention of facility-acquired heel pressure ulcers. Walsh JS; Plonczynski DJ J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 17413835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients. Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: risk factors and use of preventive devices. Perneger TV; Héliot C; Raë AC; Borst F; Gaspoz JM Arch Intern Med; 1998 Sep; 158(17):1940-5. PubMed ID: 9759692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Validity study of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI)]. González-Ruiz JM; Núñez-Méndez P; Balugo-Huertas S; Navarro-de la Peña L; García-Martín MR Enferm Intensiva; 2008; 19(3):123-29, quiz 130-1. PubMed ID: 18840327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales. Fulbrook P; Anderson A J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales: comparing their validity when identifying patients' pressure sore risk. Balzer K; Pohl C; Dassen T; Halfens R J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 17667085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Factors predicting the development of pressure ulcers in an at-risk population who receive standardized preventive care: secondary analyses of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Demarre L; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Clays E; Grypdonck M; Beeckman D J Adv Nurs; 2015 Feb; 71(2):391-403. PubMed ID: 25134858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks. Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]