135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12377201)
1. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: evaluation of callus distraction by B-scan ultrasonography.
Nocini PF; Albanese M; Wangerin K; Fior A; Trevisiol L; Kretschmer W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 30(5):286-91. PubMed ID: 12377201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ultrasound of segment distraction and callus formation in reconstruction of the mandible. Value of surgical ultrasound of callus distraction of vascularized ilial crest transplants and mandibular segments in a previously irradiated area].
Friedrich RE; Hellner D; Plambeck K; Schmelzle R
Ultraschall Med; 1997 Aug; 18(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 9381127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of distracted mandibular bone using computed tomography scan and ultrasonography: technical note.
Selim H; Elbargothy N; Nabil Y; El-Hakim I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 19474254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a computational analysis.
Boccaccio A; Pappalettere C; Kelly DJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 35(11):1940-60. PubMed ID: 17768683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of ultrasound to assess healing of a mandibular distraction wound.
Thurmüller P; Troulis M; O'Neill MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Sep; 60(9):1038-44. PubMed ID: 12215991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of B-scan ultrasonography for analysis of callus distraction in vascularized fibular grafts of the mandible: a report of three patients.
Friedrich RE; Hellner D; Plambeck K; Schmelzle R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 55(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 9191647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of mandibular symphyseal defects by trifocal distraction osteogenesis: an experimental study in Rhesus.
Li J; Ying B; Hu J; Zhu S; Braun TW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16185847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Callus molding in external and internal distraction of mandible.
Balaji SM
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 26888239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Correlation between ultrasound and radiographic data for assessment of symphyseal bony callus maturation after distraction].
Mommaerts M; Steyaert L; Polsbroek R; Correia P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2004 Feb; 105(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 15041866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. bFGF-Modified BMMSCs enhance bone regeneration following distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
Jiang X; Zou S; Ye B; Zhu S; Liu Y; Hu J
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1156-61. PubMed ID: 20036345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound monitoring of distraction osteogenesis.
Hughes CW; Williams RW; Bradley M; Irvine GH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 41(4):256-8. PubMed ID: 12946669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gray-scale ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone callus in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: initial findings.
Bruno C; Minniti S; Buttura-da-Prato E; Albanese M; Nocini PF; Pozzi-Mucelli R
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18224324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceleration of callus maturation using rhOP-1 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rat model.
Terheyden H; Wang H; Warnke PH; Springer I; Erxleben A; Ludwig K; Rueger DC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 14759113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcription factor osterix modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance callus formation during distraction osteogenesis.
Lai QG; Yuan KF; Xu X; Li DR; Li GJ; Wei FL; Yang ZJ; Luo SL; Tang XP; Li S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Apr; 111(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 20813560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Callus formation enhanced by BMP-7 ex vivo gene therapy during distraction osteogenesis in rats.
Hu J; Qi MC; Zou SJ; Li JH; Luo E
J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 17089407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the sheep mandible relapse following lengthening by distraction osteogenesis?
McTavish J; Marucci DD; Bonar SF; Walsh WR; Poole MD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct; 28(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 11467387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.
Liu Q; Liu Z; Guo H; Liang J; Zhang Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):490. PubMed ID: 35610718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction of rabbit model with mandibular ramus shortening by distraction osteogenesis at condylar neck.
Meng Q; Yang X; Long X; Li J; Cai H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):931-40. PubMed ID: 21764198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor.
Aykan A; Ugurlutan R; Zor F; Ozturk S
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
