135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12377201)
21. Application of ultrasound in callus distraction of the hypoplastic mandible: an additional method for the follow-up.
Juenger TH; Klingmueller V; Howaldt HP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 27(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 10442306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.
Roth DA; Gosain AK; McCarthy JG; Stracher MA; Lefton DR; Grayson BH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1237-47; discussion 1248-50. PubMed ID: 9105350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Distraction osteogenesis of the canine mandible: the impact of acute callus manipulation on vascularization and early bone formation.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 15635563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction after mandibular segmental resection.
Takahashi T; Fukuda M; Aiba T; Funaki K; Ohnuki T; Kondoh T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 11805773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of BMP, betaig-h3, and chitosan in early bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis in a dog model.
Kim IS; Park JW; Kwon IC; Baik BS; Cho BC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1966-77. PubMed ID: 11994601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Manipulation of callus after linear distraction: a "lifeboat" or an alternative to multivectorial distraction osteogenesis of the mandible?
Kunz C; Hammer B; Prein J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Feb; 105(2):674-9. PubMed ID: 10697176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double-blind trial.
Schortinghuis J; Bronckers AL; Gravendeel J; Stegenga B; Raghoebar GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):1014-21. PubMed ID: 18757179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Osteogenesis and mineralization in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis model is promoted by the human LMP-1 gene.
Jiang X; Chen Y; Fan X; Zhang H; Kun L
J Orthop Res; 2015 Apr; 33(4):521-6. PubMed ID: 25641592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acute open callus manipulation: Clinical experience with a new surgical technique for solving old problems in distraction osteogenesis.
Pereira AR; Pereira AP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 30591392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Maxillofacial surgery and distraction osteogenesis--history, present, perspective].
Dzhorov A; Dzhorova I
Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2003; 59(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 15641559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative expression of bone-related cytokines induced by mechanical tension-stress during distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit mandible.
Nuntanaranont T; Suttapreyasri S; Vongvatcharanon S
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):255-65. PubMed ID: 25288509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dose-dependent effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus formation during rapid distraction osteogenesis.
Chan CW; Qin L; Lee KM; Cheung WH; Cheng JC; Leung KS
J Orthop Res; 2006 Nov; 24(11):2072-9. PubMed ID: 16917923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Standardized ultrasound follow-up of callus distraction of the mandible].
Jünger TH; Klingmüller V; Howaldt HP
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 Nov; 2(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 9881004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Changes in Soft Tissue Measurements After Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.
Al-Mahdi AH; Al-Hasnawi SN; Al-Jumaily HA
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):e702-e707. PubMed ID: 27564073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mandible reconstruction using a 2-phase transport disc distraction osteogenesis: a case report.
Whitesides LM; Wunderle RC; Guerrero C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 15690299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Sonography in callus distraction of the hypoplastic mandible].
Klingmüller V; Jünger TH; Howaldt HP; Rau WS
Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):979-83. PubMed ID: 12142974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative evaluation of the mandibular distraction zone using ultrasonography and conventional radiography.
Issar Y; Sahoo NK; Sinha R; Satija L; Chattopadhyay PK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 24393569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of hyaluronic acid, chitosan, and calcium sulfate and their combined effect on early bony consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of a canine model.
Cho BC; Park JW; Baik BS; Kwon IC; Kim IS
J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 13(6):783-93. PubMed ID: 12457095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound.
Kaban LB; Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Wahl D; Linke B; Rahn B; Perrott DH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 32(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 12767878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
