These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12378367)

  • 1. Longitudinal quality control methodology for the quantitative ultrasound Achilles+ in clinical trial settings.
    Hans D; Wacker W; Genton L; Paris E; Le-Floch C; Slosman D
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Oct; 13(10):788-95. PubMed ID: 12378367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriateness of internal digital phantoms for monitoring the stability of the UBIS 5000 quantitative ultrasound device in clinical trials.
    Hans D; Alekxandrova I; Njeh C; Le-Floch C; Conicella G; Laugier P; Slosman DO
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Apr; 16(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 15536540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.
    Njeh CF; Hans D; Li J; Fan B; Fuerst T; He YQ; Tsuda-Futami E; Lu Y; Wu CY; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 11256897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attempt at standardization of bone quantitative ultrasound in Japan.
    Otani T; Fukunaga M; Yoh K; Miki T; Yamazaki K; Kishimoto H; Matsukawa M; Endoh N; Hachiya H; Kanai H; Fujiwara S; Nagai Y
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jan; 45(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 28884290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precision of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the heel bone and effects of ambient temperature on the parameters.
    Iki M; Kajita E; Mitamura S; Nishino H; Yamagami T; Nagahama N
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 10663346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
    Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of region of interest and bone size on calcaneal BMD: implications for the accuracy of quantitative ultrasound assessments at the calcaneus.
    Cheng S; Njeh CF; Fan B; Cheng X; Hans D; Wang L; Fuerst T; Genant HK
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):59-68. PubMed ID: 11806960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assess the discrimination of Achilles InSight calcaneus quantitative ultrasound device for osteoporosis in Chinese women: compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.
    Jin N; Lin S; Zhang Y; Chen F
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 19545958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measurements.
    Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Hans D; Cheng S; Genant HK
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):23-30. PubMed ID: 10721316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ultrasound--already clinically relevant?].
    Glüer CC; Barkmann R; Heller M
    Ther Umsch; 1998 Nov; 55(11):667-75. PubMed ID: 9865143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of bone.
    Malavolta N; Mule R; Frigato M
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2004 Jun; 16 Suppl(3):23-8. PubMed ID: 15506697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative ultrasound of bone in male osteoporosis.
    Mulleman D; Legroux-Gerot I; Duquesnoy B; Marchandise X; Delcambre B; Cortet B
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 12086349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study.
    Hans D; Schott AM; Chapuy MC; Benamar M; Kotzki PD; Cormier C; Pouilles JM; Meunier PJ
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Aug; 55(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 7953987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of quantitative ultrasound: comparison of three commercial scanners.
    Stewart A; Reid DM
    Bone; 2000 Jul; 27(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 10865221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound parameters in patients with Klinefelter's syndrome after long-term testosterone substitution.
    van den Bergh JP; Hermus AR; Spruyt AI; Sweep CG; Corstens FH; Smals AG
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11305084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hip fracture discrimination by the Achilles Insight QUS imaging device.
    Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Maris TG; Karantanas AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jul; 63(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17478068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quantitative ultrasound bone measurements].
    Prins SH; Jørgensen HL; Jørgensen LV; Hassager C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(19):2731-5. PubMed ID: 10827539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.