These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12378758)

  • 1. Pap smear grading system overhaul aims to eliminate confusion.
    Rollins G
    Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2001 Oct; 12(20):10, 12. PubMed ID: 12378758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference.
    Moriarty AT; Wilbur D
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytology reports: are the "Pap" classes outdated?
    Marcus PB; Justice KL
    Tex Med; 1984 Dec; 80(12):38-40. PubMed ID: 6515577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study.
    Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
    Cytopathology; 2004 Jun; 15(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 15165271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Is Bethesda system better than Pap classification?].
    Vuopala S
    Duodecim; 1999; 115(18):2030-4. PubMed ID: 11941821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revised screening guidelines reviewed.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2003 Oct; 17(10):544. PubMed ID: 14608976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New classification in cervical cytology: the Bethesda system].
    Bodó M; Tóth V
    Orv Hetil; 1991 May; 132(19):1039-40. PubMed ID: 2027678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pap smear update--the Bethesda (nomenclature) System.
    Piper DM
    West J Med; 1991 Mar; 154(3):325. PubMed ID: 2028595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Pap smear, an "endangered" species.
    Spires SE
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1997 Apr; 95(4):155-6. PubMed ID: 9110540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer screening.
    Holcomb K; Runowicz CD
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):777-97. PubMed ID: 16226691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pap, Bethesda or something else?].
    Syrjänen K
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(11):1248-50. PubMed ID: 11989011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased detection of clue cells in smears from cervical intraepithelial lesions with reduced expression of COX-2.
    Figueiredo PG; Sarian LO; Tambascia JK; Simões JA; Rabelo-Santos SH; Discacciati MG; Derchain S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Oct; 36(10):705-9. PubMed ID: 18773440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 1988 Bethesda system for cervical vaginal cytology: pros and cons.
    Barlow JF
    S D J Med; 1991 Jun; 44(6):157-8. PubMed ID: 1658929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making sense of the new cervical-cancer screening guidelines.
    Feldman S
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Dec; 365(23):2145-7. PubMed ID: 22111669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
    Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abnormal cervical cytology: new names, familiar smears.
    Carulli DT
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2003 Oct; 15(10):444-9. PubMed ID: 14606133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop.
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(7):931-4. PubMed ID: 2754794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Borderline smears: have the guidelines lessened the confusion or increased it?
    Slater DN
    Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 8833879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [How to read a PAP report?].
    Nieminen P
    Duodecim; 1998; 114(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11544696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of p16INK4a in cervical lesion of premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
    Bolanca IK; Ciglar S
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():107-11. PubMed ID: 17600938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.