250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12380670)
1. Application of wavelet transform to uterine electromyographic signals recorded using abdominal surface electrodes.
Eswaran H; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H; Lowery CL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Mar; 11(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 12380670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of stimulatory and inhibitory drugs on uterine electrical activity measured noninvasively from the abdominal surface of pregnant rats.
Buhimschi CS; Saade GR; Buhimschi IA; Gokdeniz R; Boyle MB; Garfield RE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 183(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10920311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.
Maul H; Maner WL; Olson G; Saade GR; Garfield RE
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 15280119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography.
Hassan M; Terrien J; Muszynski C; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23192483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visualization of synchronization of the uterine contraction signals: running cross-correlation and wavelet running cross-correlation methods.
Oczeretko E; Swiatecka J; Kitlas A; Laudanski T; Pierzynski P
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jan; 28(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 15919226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Denoising of the uterine EHG by an undecimated wavelet transform.
Carré P; Leman H; Fernandez C; Marque C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1104-13. PubMed ID: 9735560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of uterine contractions: a dynamical approach.
Nagarajan R; Eswaran H; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Lowery C; Preissl H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Jul; 14(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 14563086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy.
Buhimschi C; Garfield RE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 174(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 8623816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine activity monitoring during labor.
Bakker PC; Van Rijswijk S; van Geijn HP
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 18052832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A node-wise analysis of the uterine muscle networks for pregnancy monitoring.
Nader N; Hassan M; Falou W; Marque C; Khalil M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():712-715. PubMed ID: 28268427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the discrete wavelet transform for time-frequency analysis of the surface EMG signal.
Constable R; Thornhill RJ
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1993; 29():121-7. PubMed ID: 8329582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous Recording and Analysis of Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyographic Activity in Nulliparous Women During Labor.
Qian X; Li P; Shi SQ; Garfield RE; Liu H
Reprod Sci; 2017 Mar; 24(3):471-477. PubMed ID: 27436367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals.
Radomski DS
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():13-20. PubMed ID: 26484592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A quantitative analysis of uterine contraction during labor].
Redźko S; Boliński J; Urban J
Ginekol Pol; 1995 Feb; 66(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 8575675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
