These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12380670)

  • 21. Placental site does not change background uterine electromyographic activity in the middle trimester of pregnancy.
    Grgic O; Matijevic R; Vasilj O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 16309819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. External four-channel tocography during delivery.
    Spätling L; Fallenstein F; Danders R; Hasenburg A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1994 Sep; 46(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 7805998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nonlinearity of EHG signals used to distinguish active labor from normal pregnancy contractions.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2387-90. PubMed ID: 21096805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat.
    Buhimschi C; Boyle MB; Saade GR; Garfield RE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 178(4):811-22. PubMed ID: 9579450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An intrauterine pressure generator for educational simulation of labour and delivery.
    Bastos LF; Lobo MF; van Meurs WL; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep; 32(7):740-5. PubMed ID: 20494606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uterine contractility signals--an introduction to wavelet analysis.
    Oczeretko E; Swiatecka J; Laudański T
    Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2003; 48():135-40. PubMed ID: 14737960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time and frequency domain responses of the mechanomyogram and electromyogram during isometric ramp contractions: a comparison of the short-time Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms.
    Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Egan AD; Hartman MJ; Herda TJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 17070700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of labor using non-invasive Laplacian EHG recordings.
    Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Bueno Barrachina JM; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7428-31. PubMed ID: 24111462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity.
    Haran G; Elbaz M; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):412.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22284960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [An analytic method of wavelet energy value to evaluate the contraction intensity of uterus].
    Yang J; Xiao K
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 29(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 22404012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: evidence of increased in synchronization with term.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6296-9. PubMed ID: 19963919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface.
    Buhimschi C; Boyle MB; Garfield RE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 9207823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labor monitoring.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Garcia-Casado J; Ye-Lin Y; Alberola-Rubio J; Lopez Á; Perales-Marin A; Prats-Boluda G
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(8):085003. PubMed ID: 31370050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG; Marossero DE; Edwards RK; Euliano TY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1983-9. PubMed ID: 17019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography.
    Schlembach D; Maner WL; Garfield RE; Maul H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S33-9. PubMed ID: 19278772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The comparison of wavelet- and Fourier-based electromyographic indices of back muscle fatigue during dynamic contractions: validity and reliability results.
    da Silva RA; Larivière C; Arsenault AB; Nadeau S; Plamondon A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(3-4):147-62. PubMed ID: 18551835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of filtering on the classification rate of nonlinear analysis methods applied to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Falou O; Hassan M; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4182-5. PubMed ID: 26737216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Uterine electromyography during active phase compared with latent phase of labor at term.
    Trojner Bregar A; Lucovnik M; Verdenik I; Jager F; Gersak K; Garfield RE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Feb; 95(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 26575523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.