These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH. Shabanian M; Richards LC J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Göhring TN; Schönenberger KA; Lutz F Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 14579884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. Yu H; Wegehaupt FJ; Wiegand A; Roos M; Attin T; Buchalla W J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):913-22. PubMed ID: 19674824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel. Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Graf K; Johnson GH; Mehl A; Rammelsberg P Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 11931136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel. Young HL; Suzuki S Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10477999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear]. Schmidlin PR; Pasqualetti T; Imfeld T; Besek M Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CAD/CAM leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic for simulation of attrition in human enamel in vitro. Almejrad L; Almansour A; Bartlett D; Austin R Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):173-178. PubMed ID: 37951749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials. Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; van Putten M Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 10709525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]