193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12381632)
1. Utilisation of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction in Ontario over time: have referral patterns changed?
Khaykin Y; Austin PC; Tu JV; Alter DA
Heart; 2002 Nov; 88(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 12381632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction.
Alter DA; Naylor CD; Austin P; Tu JV
N Engl J Med; 1999 Oct; 341(18):1359-67. PubMed ID: 10536129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geography and service supply do not explain socioeconomic gradients in angiography use after acute myocardial infarction.
Alter DA; Naylor CD; Austin PC; Chan BT; Tu JV
CMAJ; 2003 Feb; 168(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 12566329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex differences in the use of invasive coronary procedures in Ontario.
Jaglal SB; Goel V; Naylor CD
Can J Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 10(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 8143225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biology or bias: practice patterns and long-term outcomes for men and women with acute myocardial infarction.
Alter DA; Naylor CD; Austin PC; Tu JV
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jun; 39(12):1909-16. PubMed ID: 12084587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variation in cardiovascular disease care: an Australian cohort study on sex differences in receipt of coronary procedures.
Fogg AJ; Welsh J; Banks E; Abhayaratna W; Korda RJ
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e026507. PubMed ID: 31337660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada.
Tu JV; Pashos CL; Naylor CD; Chen E; Normand SL; Newhouse JP; McNeil BJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 May; 336(21):1500-5. PubMed ID: 9154770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal changes in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Ontario, 1992-1996.
Tu JV; Naylor CD; Austin P
CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1257-61. PubMed ID: 10584086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome following acute myocardial infarction: are differences among physician specialties the result of quality of care or case mix?
Frances CD; Go AS; Dauterman KW; Deosaransingh K; Jung DL; Gettner S; Newman JM; Massie BM; Browner WS
Arch Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 159(13):1429-36. PubMed ID: 10399894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of underuse, overuse, and discretionary use on geographic variation in the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction.
Guadagnoli E; Landrum MB; Normand SL; Ayanian JZ; Garg P; Hauptman PJ; Ryan TJ; McNeil BJ
Med Care; 2001 May; 39(5):446-58. PubMed ID: 11317093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Socioeconomic status, service patterns, and perceptions of care among survivors of acute myocardial infarction in Canada.
Alter DA; Iron K; Austin PC; Naylor CD;
JAMA; 2004 Mar; 291(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 14996779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variations in the utilization of coronary angiography for elderly patients with an acute myocardial infarction. An analysis using hierarchical logistic regression.
Gatsonis CA; Epstein AM; Newhouse JP; Normand SL; McNeil BJ
Med Care; 1995 Jun; 33(6):625-42. PubMed ID: 7760578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The appropriateness of performing coronary angiography in two major teaching hospitals in Israel.
Mozes B; Shabtai E
Int J Qual Health Care; 1994 Sep; 6(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 7795960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of diagnostic coronary angiography in women and men presenting with acute myocardial infarction: a matched cohort study.
Bjerking LH; Hansen KW; Madsen M; Jensen JS; Madsen JK; Sørensen R; Galatius S
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Jun; 16():120. PubMed ID: 27250115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: do cardiologists do it better? A comparison of secondary and tertiary centre management in New Zealand.
Conaglen P; Sebastian C; Jayaraman C; Abraham A; Makkada V; Devlin G
N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U890. PubMed ID: 15156208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional variation in angiography, coronary artery bypass surgery, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in Manitoba, 1987 to 1992: the funnel effect.
Hartford K; Ross LL; Walld R
Med Care; 1998 Jul; 36(7):1022-32. PubMed ID: 9674620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac rehabilitation following an acute coronary syndrome: Trends in referral, predictors and mortality outcome in a multicenter national registry between years 2006-2013: Report from the Working Group on Cardiac Rehabilitation, the Israeli Heart Society.
Chernomordik F; Sabbag A; Tzur B; Kopel E; Goldkorn R; Matetzky S; Goldenberg I; Shlomo N; Klempfner R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 24(2):123-132. PubMed ID: 27881758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International comparison of acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes using quality indicators.
Zusman O; Bebb O; Hall M; Dondo TB; Timmis A; Schiele F; Fox KA; Kornowski R; Gale CP; Iakobishvili Z
Heart; 2019 Jun; 105(11):820-825. PubMed ID: 30700519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary angiography in the elderly with acute myocardial infarction.
Harpaz D; Rozenman Y; Behar S; Boyko V; Mandelzweig L; Gottlieb S;
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 116(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 16839633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in physician management of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1987.
Hlatky MA; Cotugno HE; Mark DB; O'Connor C; Califf RM; Pryor DB
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 61(8):515-8. PubMed ID: 3344676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
