749 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12381707)
21. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.
Gangnon RE; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Alagoz O; Weedon-Fekjær H; Holford TR; Trentham-Dietz A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 25787716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid increase in incidence of breast ductal carcinoma in situ in Girona, Spain 1983-2007.
Puig-Vives M; Pollan M; Rue M; Osca-Gelis G; Saez M; Izquierdo A; Marcos-Gragera R
Breast; 2012 Oct; 21(5):646-51. PubMed ID: 22340960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma.
Ernster VL; Barclay J
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):151-6. PubMed ID: 9709292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Carcinoma in situ of the breast in New South Wales, Australia: Current status and trends over the last 40 year.
Jacklyn G; Morrell S; McGeechan K; Houssami N; Irwig L; Pathmanathan N; Barratt A
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():170-178. PubMed ID: 28882419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?
Weigel S; Hense HW; Heidrich J; Berkemeyer S; Heindel W; Heidinger O
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 26505802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast density in relation to risk of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women undergoing screening mammography.
MacKenzie TA; Titus-Ernstoff L; Vacek PM; Geller B; Weiss JE; Goodrich ME; Carney PA
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Nov; 18(9):939-45. PubMed ID: 17638106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Association between radiologists' and facilities' characteristics and mammography screening detection of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Théberge I; Vandal N; Perron L; Guertin MH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):255-266. PubMed ID: 33392846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.
van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; Fracheboud J; Overbeek LI; Broeders MJ; Wesseling J; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 27160733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme?
Kessar P; Perry N; Vinnicombe SJ; Hussain HK; Carpenter R; Wells CA
Clin Radiol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):807-14. PubMed ID: 12384106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Results of 23,810 cases of ductal carcinoma-in-situ.
Sumner WE; Koniaris LG; Snell SE; Spector S; Powell J; Avisar E; Moffat F; Livingstone AS; Franceschi D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1638-43. PubMed ID: 17245612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer by histology type following mammography screening.
Luke C; Priest K; Roder D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 16629519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast cancer in Singapore: some perspectives.
Jara-Lazaro AR; Thilagaratnam S; Tan PH
Breast Cancer; 2010; 17(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19701678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
