172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382243)
1. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the urogenital distress inventory and the incontinence impact questionnaire.
Hagen S; Hanley J; Capewell A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2002; 21(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 12382243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Arabic validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Adapted Incontinence Impact Questionnaires--short forms.
El-Azab AS; Mascha EJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 18671300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population.
Cam C; Sakalli M; Ay P; Cam M; Karateke A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 17083117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient reported outcomes tools in an observational study of female stress urinary incontinence.
van de Vaart H; Falconer C; Quail D; Timlin L; Manning M; Tincello D; Tunn R
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Mar; 29(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 19283868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construct validity of the incontinence severity index.
Murphy M; Culligan PJ; Arce CM; Graham CA; Blackwell L; Heit MH
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16652379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited.
van der Vaart CH; de Leeuw JR; Roovers JP; Heintz AP
Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12579625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in a Dutch population.
Utomo E; Korfage IJ; Wildhagen MF; Steensma AB; Bangma CH; Blok BF
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Jan; 34(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 24167010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: a revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis.
Harvey MA; Kristjansson B; Griffith D; Versi E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11483899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term patient satisfaction following cadaveric pubovaginal sling incontinence surgery using the UDI and IIQ-7 questionnaires.
Pianezza ML; Joffe R; Chugh T; Radomski SB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 16998860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form.
Gotoh M; Homma Y; Funahashi Y; Matsukawa Y; Kato M
Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 19207608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Swedish version of the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory.
Franzén K; Johansson JE; Karlsson J; Nilsson K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 May; 92(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 22686542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality-of-life impact and treatment of urinary incontinence in ethnically diverse older women.
Huang AJ; Brown JS; Kanaya AM; Creasman JM; Ragins AI; Van Den Eeden SK; Thom DH
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Oct; 166(18):2000-6. PubMed ID: 17030834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Validation of the Spanish version of the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in pregnant women].
Ruiz de Viñaspre Hernández R; Tomás Aznar C; Rubio Aranda E
Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 21871693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 cutoff scores in urinary incontinent women.
Skorupska K; Grzybowska ME; Kubik-Komar A; Rechberger T; Miotla P
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 33726776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).
Barber MD; Walters MD; Bump RC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 16021067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence.
Kwon S; Visco AG; Fitzgerald MP; Ye W; Whitehead WE;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):323-31; discussion 331-4. PubMed ID: 15616750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of a questionnaire to measure the severity of symptoms and the quality of life before and after surgery for stress incontinence.
Kulseng-Hanssen S; Borstad E
BJOG; 2003 Nov; 110(11):983-8. PubMed ID: 14592582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of the Polish version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form.
Skorupska KA; Miotla P; Kubik-Komar A; Skorupski P; Rechberger T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():171-174. PubMed ID: 28633095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The psychometric properties of the PRAFAB-questionnaire: a brief assessment questionnaire to evaluate severity of urinary incontinence in women.
Hendriks EJ; Bernards AT; Berghmans BC; de Bie RA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(7):998-1007. PubMed ID: 17563109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-reported impact of urinary incontinence--results from treatment seeking women in 14 European countries.
Monz B; Pons ME; Hampel C; Hunskaar S; Quail D; Samsioe G; Sykes D; Wagg A; Papanicolaou S
Maturitas; 2005 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S24-34. PubMed ID: 16297579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
