111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382357)
1. Monofilament assessment of neuropathy in a community diabetes clinic.
Rheeder P; van Wyk JT; Hokken JW; Hueting HM
S Afr Med J; 2002 Sep; 92(9):715-9. PubMed ID: 12382357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research.
Smieja M; Hunt DL; Edelman D; Etchells E; Cornuz J; Simel DL
J Gen Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 14(7):418-24. PubMed ID: 10417599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the effect of duration of diabetes mellitus on peripheral neuropathy using the United Kingdom screening test scoring system, bio-thesiometry and aesthesiometry.
Oguejiofor OC; Odenigbo CU; Oguejiofor CB
Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Sep; 13(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20857777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the monofilament with other testing modalities for foot ulcer susceptibility.
Miranda-Palma B; Sosenko JM; Bowker JH; Mizel MS; Boulton AJ
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 70(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 16126117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening.
Kamei N; Yamane K; Nakanishi S; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Ohshita K; Watanabe H; Fujikawa R; Okubo M; Kohno N
J Diabetes Complications; 2005; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15642490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Examination of peripheral sensibility. Vibration test is more sensitive than monofilament test].
Sörman E; Edwall LL
Lakartidningen; 2002 Mar; 99(12):1339-40. PubMed ID: 11998167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy severe enough to cause a loss of protective sensation in a population-based sample of people with known and newly detected diabetes in Barbados: a cross-sectional study.
Adams OP; Herbert JR; Howitt C; Unwin N
Diabet Med; 2019 Dec; 36(12):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 31094005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test.
Oyer DS; Saxon D; Shah A
Endocr Pract; 2007; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17360294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a new device in the assessment of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes.
Bracewell N; Game F; Jeffcoate W; Scammell BE
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1553-5. PubMed ID: 22672257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The utility of Vibratip in accurate identification of loss of protective sensation in the contralateral foot of patients admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer.
Pasangha E; George B; Jayalakshmi V; Devi P; Ayyar V; Bantwal G
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2021; 15(3):857-862. PubMed ID: 33873055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of diabetic foot screening in Primary Care.
Alonso-Fernández M; Mediavilla-Bravo JJ; López-Simarro F; Comas-Samper JM; Carramiñana-Barrera F; Mancera-Romero J; de Santiago Nocito A;
Endocrinol Nutr; 2014; 61(6):311-7. PubMed ID: 24582291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile phone generated vibrations used to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
May JD; Morris MWJ
Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Dec; 23(4):281-284. PubMed ID: 29202988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different screening tests for detecting diabetic foot neuropathy.
Forouzandeh F; Aziz Ahari A; Abolhasani F; Larijani B
Acta Neurol Scand; 2005 Dec; 112(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 16281925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peripheral neuropathy is an early complication of type 2 diabetes in adolescence.
Karabouta Z; Barnett S; Shield JP; Ryan FJ; Crowne EC
Pediatr Diabetes; 2008 Apr; 9(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 18221439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of recommended non-invasive chairside screening tests for diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review with meta-analyses.
McIllhatton A; Lanting S; Lambkin D; Leigh L; Casey S; Chuter V
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2021 Dec; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 34952841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Clinical Tests for Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy in a Type 1 Diabetes Cohort.
César Ernesto LC; Néstor MZ; Raúl IS; Francisco Javier PV; Tania S MU; Francisco BH; Alejandro CM; Marcela JZ; Almeda-Valdes P
Endocr Pract; 2021 Jun; 27(6):567-570. PubMed ID: 33798738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel robotic monofilament test for diabetic neuropathy.
Wilasrusmee C; Suthakorn J; Guerineau C; Itsarachaiyot Y; Sa-Ing V; Proprom N; Lertsithichai P; Jirasisrithum S; Kittur D
Asian J Surg; 2010 Oct; 33(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 21377106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
Baker N
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Easier operation and similar power of 10 g monofilament test for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Zhang Q; Yi N; Liu S; Zheng H; Qiao X; Xiong Q; Liu X; Zhang S; Wen J; Ye H; Zhou L; Li Y; Hu R; Lu B
J Int Med Res; 2018 Aug; 46(8):3278-3284. PubMed ID: 29808737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
