218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382608)
1. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging.
Hubálková H; Hora K; Seidl Z; Krásenský J
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Sep; 10(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 12382608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report.
Devge C; Tjellström A; Nellström H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 9197100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disturbances caused by dental materials in magnetic resonance imaging.
Lissac M; Coudert JL; Briguet A; Amiel M
Int Dent J; 1992 Aug; 42(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 1399040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Artifacts induced by dental reconstruction materials: the case of titanium].
Savane S; N'Dindin AC; N'Dindin GB; Kouame PA; Doyon D
Odontostomatol Trop; 2001 Sep; 24(95):33-7. PubMed ID: 11808373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Patient for nuclear magnetic tomography--problems with endoprostheses and dental prostheses?].
Wintersperger B
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Jul; 148(29-30):16. PubMed ID: 16913014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.
Costa AL; Appenzeller S; Yasuda CL; Pereira FR; Zanardi VA; Cendes F
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E278-82. PubMed ID: 19300375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.
Johannsen KM; de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig JM; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):394-407. PubMed ID: 36178613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ossicular implants at 3 T.
Shellock FG; Meepos LN; Stapleton MR; Valencerina S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):871-7. PubMed ID: 22643444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
New PF; Rosen BR; Brady TJ; Buonanno FS; Kistler JP; Burt CT; Hinshaw WS; Newhouse JH; Pohost GM; Taveras JM
Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 6828719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic field interactions of orthodontic wires during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 Tesla.
Klocke A; Kemper J; Schulze D; Adam G; Kahl-Nieke B
J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 16044226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reduction of NMR image artefacts by using optimal materials as diagnostic aids and implants].
Fritzsche S; Thull R; Haase A
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 Mar; 39(3):42-6. PubMed ID: 8193244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
