135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382701)
1. A new paradigm in personal dosimetry using LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Cassata JR; Moscovitch M; Rotunda JE; Velbeck KJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):27-42. PubMed ID: 12382701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The application of LiF:Mg,Cu,P to large scale personnel dosimetry: current status and future directions.
Moscovitch M; St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Rotunda JE; Ramlo M; Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):248-54. PubMed ID: 16835277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. UV-induced bleaching of deep traps in Harshaw TLD LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
Benevides L; Voss S; Nita I; Rotunda J; Velbeck K; Luo LZ; Moscovitch M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):199-201. PubMed ID: 21310735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term fade study of the DT-702 LiF: Mg,Cu,P TLD.
Delzer JA; Hawley JR; Romanyukha A; Nemmers S; Selwyn R; Benevides LA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 18621919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Ti or LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Luo LZ; Velbeck KJ; Rotunda JE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):211-6. PubMed ID: 12382737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy.
Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of effectiveness of thermoluminescent crystals LiF:Mg,Ti, and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for clinical dosimetry.
Harris CK; Elson HR; Lamba MA; Foster AE
Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1527-9. PubMed ID: 9304583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thermoluminescence dosimetry of a thermal neutron field and comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fernandes AC; Santos JP; Kling A; Marques JG; Gonçalves IC; Carvalho AF; Santos L; Cardoso J; Osvay M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15367765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual monitoring in nuclear medicine therapeutic procedures using extremity dosemeters LiF(Mg, Cu, P).
Sarti G; Del Dottore F; Fabbri C; Tassinari L; Pagan S; Rustignoli M; Motta P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):521-4. PubMed ID: 21030398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A high sensitivity LiF thermoluminescent dosimeter--LiF(Mg, Cu, P).
Wu DK; Sun FY; Dai HC
Health Phys; 1984 May; 46(5):1063-7. PubMed ID: 6724912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The applicability of the PTTL dose re-analysis method to the Harshaw LiF:Mg,Cu,P material.
Moscovitch M; Benevides L; Romanyukha A; Hull F; Duffy M; Voss S; Velbeck KJ; Nita I; Rotunda JE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):161-4. PubMed ID: 21450701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity loss of Lif:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosemeters caused by oven annealing.
Lüpke M; Goblet F; Polivka B; Seifert H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 16464837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The MCNP-4C2 design of a two element photon/electron dosemeter that uses magnesium/copper/phosphorus doped lithium fluoride.
Eakins JS; Bartlett DT; Hager LG; Molinos-Solsona C; Tanner RJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 17951605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FADING EFFECT OF LiF:Mg,Ti AND LiF:Mg,Cu,P Ext-Rad AND WHOLE-BODY DETECTORS.
Pereira J; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Saraiva M; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):177-80. PubMed ID: 26503857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thermoluminescence properties of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si pellets in radiation dosimetry.
Nam YM; Kim JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):467-70. PubMed ID: 12382923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
