200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382729)
1. Photon energy response of luminescence dosemeters and its impact on assessment of Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) in mixed fields of varying energies of photons and beta radiation.
Pradhan AS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):173-8. PubMed ID: 12382729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. INTERCOMPARISON OF EYE LENS DOSEMETERS.
Behrens R; Hupe O; Busch F; Denk J; Engelhardt J; Günther K; Hödlmoser H; Jordan M; Strohmaier J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 27009241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibration of TLD badges for photons of energy above 6 MeV and dosimetric intricacies in high energy gamma ray fields encountered in nuclear power plants.
Pradhan AS; Bakshi AK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 12018745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intercomparison measurements of extremity dosemeters in beta and/or photon radiation fields.
Helmstädter K; Ambrosi P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):183-6. PubMed ID: 11586725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of an algorithm for TLD badge system for dosimetry in the field of X and gamma radiation in terms of Hp(10).
Bakshi AK; Srivastava K; Varadharajan G; Pradhan AS; Kher RK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 16984896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy and directional response for the Harshaw dosemeter holders 8814 and 8891, and its effect on the appropriate radiation qualities for absolute calibration.
Børretzen I; Wøhni T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 12596986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response of Harshaw neutron thermoluminescence dosemeters in terms of the revised ICRP/ICRU recommendations.
Veinot KG; Hertel NE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 15788417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Studies on the response of the TLD badge for high-energy photons.
Kumar M; Kher RK; Sahni G; Chhokra K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 17681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shielding effects of metallic encapsulations and radiographic contrast agents for catheter-based intravascular brachytherapy.
Nath R; Yue N
Cardiovasc Radiat Med; 2001; 2(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 11340013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angular dependence of the TL reading of thin alpha-Al2O3:C dosemeters exposed to different beta spectra.
Mancosu P; Ripamonti D; Veronese I; Cantone MC; Giussani A; Tosi G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 15788418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy response of GR-200A thermoluminescence dosemeters to 60Co and to monoenergetic synchrotron radiation in the energy range 28-40 keV.
Emiro F; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Fedon C; Longo R; Tromba G; Russo P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 25737582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of the CaF₂:Tm (TLD-300) glow curve as an indicator of beam quality for low-energy photon beams.
Muñoz ID; Avila O; Gamboa-deBuen I; Brandan ME
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2135-44. PubMed ID: 25683355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response of radiation protection dosemeters in mixed high-energy photon and electron radiation fields.
Büermann L; Gargioni E; Kramer HM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):223-6. PubMed ID: 11586735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between protection and operational quantities in dosimetry of photon external exposure-deficiencies of Hp(10).
Chumak VV; Bakhanova EV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12918787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose equivalent response of a TLD badge--influence of body backscatter.
Pradhan AS; Gambhir SP; Patel PH; Bhatt RC; Supe SJ
Health Phys; 1990 Sep; 59(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2394587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ENERGY RESPONSE FACTOR of BeO DOSEMETER CHIPS: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND GENERAL CAVITY THEORY STUDY.
Sarigul N; Surucu M; Aydogan B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 30806472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of bremsstrahlung photon energy in the environment of high-energy electron accelerator using CaSO4:Dy based TL dosemeter.
Bakshi AK; Nayak MK; Haridas G; Chatterjee S; Kher RK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17575302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ENEA personal dosemeters for assessing Hp(10) and Hp(0.07).
Bedogni R; Fantuzzi E; Monteventi F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):187-90. PubMed ID: 11586726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
