These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382737)

  • 1. Evaluating two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Ti or LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Luo LZ; Velbeck KJ; Rotunda JE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):211-6. PubMed ID: 12382737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of effectiveness of thermoluminescent crystals LiF:Mg,Ti, and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for clinical dosimetry.
    Harris CK; Elson HR; Lamba MA; Foster AE
    Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1527-9. PubMed ID: 9304583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Cu,P thin detectors for mixed beta-gamma fields.
    Ginjaume M; Pérez S; Ortega X; Duch MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):316-20. PubMed ID: 16644980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UV-induced bleaching of deep traps in Harshaw TLD LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Benevides L; Voss S; Nita I; Rotunda J; Velbeck K; Luo LZ; Moscovitch M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):199-201. PubMed ID: 21310735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermoluminescence dosimetry of a thermal neutron field and comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fernandes AC; Santos JP; Kling A; Marques JG; Gonçalves IC; Carvalho AF; Santos L; Cardoso J; Osvay M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15367765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of TL measurements in a mixed field of thermal neutrons and photons.
    Fernandes AC; Gonçalves IC; Ferro Carvalho A; Santos J; Cardoso J; Santos L; Osvay M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):481-4. PubMed ID: 12382796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TYPE TESTING OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETERS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF Hp(10) AND Hp(0.07).
    Pereira JS; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Caldeira M; Carvalhal G; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 30496554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dose-response of Harshaw TLD-700H.
    Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ; Ramlo MJ; Rotunda JE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):255-8. PubMed ID: 16581931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The MCNP-4C2 design of a two element photon/electron dosemeter that uses magnesium/copper/phosphorus doped lithium fluoride.
    Eakins JS; Bartlett DT; Hager LG; Molinos-Solsona C; Tanner RJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 17951605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of Harshaw TLD-100H two-element Dosemeter.
    Luo LZ; Rotunda JE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):324-30. PubMed ID: 16644944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term fade study of the DT-702 LiF: Mg,Cu,P TLD.
    Delzer JA; Hawley JR; Romanyukha A; Nemmers S; Selwyn R; Benevides LA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 18621919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lithium fluoride: from LiF:Mg,Ti to LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Bilski P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):199-206. PubMed ID: 12382860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the performance of two LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P dosemeters for extremity monitoring.
    Freire LC; Pereira MF; Calado AM; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):140-3. PubMed ID: 21081520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of whole-body personal TL dosemeters in mixed field beta-gamma radiation.
    Ciupek K; Aksamit D; Wołoszczuk K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Nov; 162(1-2):20-3. PubMed ID: 25009188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NUCLEAR HEATING IN LIF DOSEMETERS IN A FUSION NEUTRON FIELD, TRIAL OF DIRECT COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS.
    Pohorecki W; Obryk B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Aug; 180(1-4):129-133. PubMed ID: 29036685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new paradigm in personal dosimetry using LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Cassata JR; Moscovitch M; Rotunda JE; Velbeck KJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):27-42. PubMed ID: 12382701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The application of LiF:Mg,Cu,P to large scale personnel dosimetry: current status and future directions.
    Moscovitch M; St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Rotunda JE; Ramlo M; Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):248-54. PubMed ID: 16835277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.