These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382773)
1. The use of Monte Carlo simulations for accurate dose determination with thermoluminescence dosemeters in radiation therapy beams. Mobit P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):383-6. PubMed ID: 12382773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An EGS4 Monte Carlo examination of general cavity theory. Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jul; 42(7):1319-34. PubMed ID: 9253042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The energy correction factor of LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters in megavoltage electron beams: Monte Carlo simulations and experiments. Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jun; 41(6):979-93. PubMed ID: 8794479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV). Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence of diamond thermoluminescent dosimeters in radiotherapy beams. Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1913-27. PubMed ID: 9364587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments. Mobit PN; Mayles P; Nahum AE Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 8778821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co. Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays. Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam. Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams. Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence factors of common TLD materials in photon and electron beams. Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2015-32. PubMed ID: 9725586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter in megavoltage photon and electron beams. Araki F; Ohno T Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122102. PubMed ID: 25471975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks. Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV. Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source. Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Energy response of an aluminium oxide detector in kilovoltage and megavoltage photon beams: an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation study. Agyingi EO; Mobit PN; Sandison GA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 16046555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response. Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electron fluence perturbation correction factors for solid state detectors irradiated in megavoltage electron beams. Mobit PN; Sandison GA; Nahum AE Phys Med Biol; 2000 Feb; 45(2):255-65. PubMed ID: 10701502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction factors kE and kQ for LiF-TLDs for dosimetry in megavoltage electron and photon beams. Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Saum F; Gainey M; Pychlau C; Kapsch RP; Zink K Z Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 25(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 24973310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response. Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]