136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12382795)
1. Validation of a radiotherapy treatment planning system using an anthropomorphic phantom and MTS-N thermoluminescent detectors.
Waligórski MP; Bilski P; Lesiak J; Byrski E; Rozwadowska-Bogusz B; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Ochab E; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):477-80. PubMed ID: 12382795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose distribution of secondary radiation in a water phantom for a proton pencil beam-EURADOS WG9 intercomparison exercise.
Stolarczyk L; Trinkl S; Romero-Expósito M; Mojżeszek N; Ambrozova I; Domingo C; Davídková M; Farah J; Kłodowska M; Knežević Ž; Liszka M; Majer M; Miljanić S; Ploc O; Schwarz M; Harrison RM; Olko P
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Apr; 63(8):085017. PubMed ID: 29509148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total body irradiation, toward optimal individual delivery: dose evaluation with metal oxide field effect transistors, thermoluminescence detectors, and a treatment planning system.
Bloemen-van Gurp EJ; Mijnheer BJ; Verschueren TA; Lambin P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(4):1297-304. PubMed ID: 17881143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy dependence of new thermoluminescent detectors in terms of HP(10) values.
Miljanić S; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Ranogajec-Komor M; Krpan K; Vekić B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 14690327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A TL-based anthropomorphic benchmark for verifying 3-D dose distributions from external electron beams calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Waligórski MP; Baranczyk R; Hyödynmaa S; Eskola J; Lesiak J; Rozwadowska-Bogusz B; Kolodziejczyk A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 16644929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeters for low-dose measurements in maxillofacial anthropomorphic phantoms.
Koivisto JH; Wolff JE; Kiljunen T; Schulze D; Kortesniemi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):266–278. PubMed ID: 26219008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of electron dose calculations accuracy of a treatment planning system in radiotherapy of breast cancer with photon-electron technique.
Toossi MTB; Soleymanifard S; Farhood B; Farkhari A; Knaup C
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018 Dec; 14(Supplement):S1110-S1116. PubMed ID: 30539854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculation of tomotherapy and cyberknife treatment planning systems: a dosimetric study.
Schneider U; Hälg RA; Hartmann M; Mack A; Storelli F; Joosten A; Möckli R; Besserer J
Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 24290992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of exit skin dose for 192Ir intracavitary accelerated partial breast irradiation with thermoluminescent dosimeters.
Raffi JA; Davis SD; Hammer CG; Micka JA; Kunugi KA; Musgrove JE; Winston JW; Ricci-Ott TJ; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2693-702. PubMed ID: 20632580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Entrance dose measurement: a simple and reliable technique.
Banjade DP; Raj TA; Ng BS; Xavier S; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12804703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetry audit of radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Bulski W; Chełmiński K; Rostkowska J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):472-6. PubMed ID: 25848119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: On the feasibility of performing dosimetry in target and organ at risk using polymer dosimetry gel and thermoluminescence detectors in an anthropomorphic, deformable, and multimodal pelvis phantom.
Marot M; Elter A; Mann P; Schwahofer A; Lang C; Johnen W; Körber SA; Beuthien-Baumann B; Gillmann C
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5501-5510. PubMed ID: 34260079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. END-TO-END AUDIT: COMPARISON OF TLD AND LITHIUM FORMATE EPR DOSIMETRY.
Adolfsson E; Wesolowska P; Izewska J; Lund E; Tedgren ÅC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(1):119-122. PubMed ID: 30929009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorbed dose measurements of a handheld 50 kVP X-ray source in water with thermoluminescence dosemeters.
Soares C; Drupieski C; Wingert B; Pritchett G; Pagonis V; O'Brien M; Sliski A; Bilski P; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):78-82. PubMed ID: 16735571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Dose Calculation for Hemibody Treatments at Extended Distance Using a Commercial Treatment Planning System.
Batta Y; Juhasz J; Farrell T
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):261-271. PubMed ID: 31176434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
