These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12383323)
1. The sonographic evaluation of tubal patency with stimulated acoustic emission imaging. Prefumo F; Serafini G; Martinoli C; Gandolfo N; Gandolfo NG; Derchi LE Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 20(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 12383323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ultrasound hysterosalpingography with levovist in the diagnosis of tubaric patency]. Guazzaroni M; Mari A; Politi C; Guazzaroni M; Remedi S; Mallarini G; Simonetti G Radiol Med; 2001; 102(1-2):62-6. PubMed ID: 11677440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Radiologic versus ultrasound fallopian tube imaging. Painfulness of the examination and diagnostic reliability of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast-ultrasonography with echovist 200]. Korell M; Seehaus D; Strowitzki T; Hepp H Ultraschall Med; 1997 Feb; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9173524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography. Socolov D; Boian I; Boiculese L; Tamba B; Anghelache-Lupascu I; Socolov R Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution. Boudghène FP; Bazot M; Robert Y; Perrot N; Rocourt N; Antoine JM; Morris H; Leroy JL; Uzan S; Bigot JM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients. Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients? Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye. Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with SH U 454 (Echovist) for the assessment of tubal patency. Reis MM; Soares SR; Cancado ML; Camargos AF Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3049-52. PubMed ID: 9853854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape. Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined Real-Time Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography with B Mode Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in the Evaluation of Fallopian Tube Patency in Patients Undergoing Infertility Investigations. Chen S; Du X; Chen Q; Chen S Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9408141. PubMed ID: 31275995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency. Exacoustos C; Zupi E; Carusotti C; Lanzi G; Marconi D; Arduini D J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Aug; 10(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 14567814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With Four-Dimensional Technique for Screening Fallopian Tubal Patency: Let's Make an Exploration. Chen F; Quan J; Huang P; You X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 28034794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the assessment of Fallopian tube patency. Sladkevicius P; Ojha K; Campbell S; Nargund G Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 16(7):644-7. PubMed ID: 11169372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal salpingo-sonography (TSSG) in the evaluation of tubal patency. Volpi E; De Grandis T; Sismondi P; Giacardi M; Rustichelli S; Patriarca A; Bocci A Acta Eur Fertil; 1991; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 1844194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility. Chan CC; Ng EH; Tang OS; Chan KK; Ho PC Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):909-13. PubMed ID: 16097985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Dijkman AB; Mol BW; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Hogerzeil HV Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 35(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10930765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]