These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12384733)

  • 1. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.
    Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A; Qose I
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S124-30. PubMed ID: 12384733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Minimal invasive anterior midline approach to L2-L5].
    Mehren C; Korge A; Siepe C; Grochulla F; Mayer HM
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2010 Nov; 22(5-6):573-81. PubMed ID: 21153014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimal invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini ALIF).
    Aebi M; Parthasarathy S; Avadhani A; Rajasekaran S
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):335-6. PubMed ID: 20140463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the lumbosacral junction].
    Korge A; Siepe C; Mehren C; Mayer HM
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2010 Nov; 22(5-6):582-92. PubMed ID: 21153015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Laparoscopic 2-level fusion of the lumbar spine with Bagby and Kuslich implants].
    Olinger A; Hildebrandt U; Pistorius G; Lindemann W; Menger MD
    Chirurg; 1996 Apr; 67(4):348-50. PubMed ID: 8646920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(6):691-9; discussion 700. PubMed ID: 9089943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1.
    Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Wong AP; Khanna R; Barnawi A; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 23916495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications.
    Bertagnoli R; Kumar S
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S131-6. PubMed ID: 12384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1923-32. PubMed ID: 16924209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
    Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement.
    Mayer HM; Wiechert K
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S159-65. PubMed ID: 12234444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Wagner WH; Regan JJ; Leary SP; Lanman TH; Johnson JP; Rao RK; Cossman DV
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results.
    Blumenthal SL; Ohnmeiss DD; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 14526193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Leary SP; Regan JJ; Lanman TH; Wagner WH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1001-11. PubMed ID: 17450076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Total disc prosthesis for painful degenerative lumbar disc disease].
    Karatoprak O; Aydoğan M; Oztürk C; Mirzanli C; Tezer M; Hamzaoğlu A
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 18180557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study.
    Leivseth G; Braaten S; Frobin W; Brinckmann P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1726-33. PubMed ID: 16816770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.