393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12385930)
21. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Gonzalgo ML; Bastian PJ; Mangold LA; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16413345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. E-cadherin expression as a marker of tumor aggressiveness in routinely processed radical prostatectomy specimens.
De Marzo AM; Knudsen B; Chan-Tack K; Epstein JI
Urology; 1999 Apr; 53(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 10197845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.
Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Histopathological prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy after population based screening.
Hoedemaeker RF; Rietbergen JB; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 10893598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.
Bhatta-Dhar N; Reuther AM; Zippe C; Klein EA
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15028451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated by radical prostatectomy: a study of 47 cases.
Osunkoya AO; Nielsen ME; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Mar; 32(3):468-72. PubMed ID: 18300802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pathological extension of prostate cancer as defined by Gleason score on biopsy.
Dall'Oglio MF; Crippa A; Paranhos M; Nesrallah LJ; Leite KR; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2005; 31(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 16137400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Significance of small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer on needle biopsy.
Yang XJ; Lecksell K; Potter SR; Epstein JI
Urology; 1999 Sep; 54(3):528-32. PubMed ID: 10475366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score.
Tefilli MV; Gheiler EL; Tiguert R; Banerjee M; Sakr W; Grignon D; Wood DP; Pontes JE
Prostate; 1999 Apr; 39(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 10221268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of microvessel density in predicting recurrence in pathologic Stage T3 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Gettman MT; Pacelli A; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute M; Zincke H; Bostwick DG
Urology; 1999 Sep; 54(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 10475358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C).
Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The results of radical prostatectomy at a community hospital during the prostate specific antigen era.
Smitt MC; Heltzel M
Cancer; 1996 Mar; 77(5):928-33. PubMed ID: 8608486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy?
Rubin MA; Dunn R; Kambham N; Misick CP; O'Toole KM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1634-40. PubMed ID: 11117784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gleason score as predictor of clinicopathologic findings and biochemical (PSA) progression following radical prostatectomy.
Guimaraes MS; Quintal MM; Meirelles LR; Magna LA; Ferreira U; Billis A
Int Braz J Urol; 2008; 34(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18341718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minute focus of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Montanari E; Del Nero A; Gazzano G; Mangiarotti B; Bernardini P; Longo F; Cordima G; Itri E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2009 Mar; 81(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19499751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ten-year survival after radical prostatectomy: specimen Gleason score is the predictor in organ-confined prostate cancer.
Bianco FJ; Wood DP; Cher ML; Powell IJ; Souza JW; Pontes JE
Clin Prostate Cancer; 2003 Mar; 1(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15040883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
