These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12387209)

  • 1. Implementing the priority focus process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 12387209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Putting the pieces together through a revised survey process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 12387210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shared visions--new pathways.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12387206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Organizations to test their own compliance through self-assessment.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 12387208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What JCAHO says it's doing to address OIG's concerns.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):151. PubMed ID: 10621280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A primer on JCAHO performance data.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2002 Mar; 6(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 11951364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-driven indicators for quality.
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1998 Aug; 10(8):11-2. PubMed ID: 10182817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital survey process changes in 2000.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11009951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating outcomes into the accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 11009950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new approach to JCAHO accreditation standards.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Oct; 22(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 12387207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving scoring consistency with the scan process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jul; 24(7):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15328761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality in an era of cost containment.
    Grachek MK; Christiansen D
    Balance; 1998; 2(7):20-2. PubMed ID: 10187161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
    Bender N
    Ambul Outreach; 1998; ():23-4. PubMed ID: 10346585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measures help surveyors compare hospitals.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Mar; 29(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 15015431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ORYX data collection valuable but difficult and labor-intensive, some say.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Oct; 26(10):133-7. PubMed ID: 11586587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ORYX data to play key role in new JCAHO survey process.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Jan; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12561296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospitals getting more RFIs in 2006: what problems are surveyors finding?
    Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Aug; 14(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 16872055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Your next survey will be customized; get ready for JCAHO's priority focus.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Mar; 29(3):29-32. PubMed ID: 15015430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.