BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

872 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12387610)

  • 21. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.
    Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Hosoe M; Sukegawa S; Yamauchi K; Furuki Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Le Fort I downsliding osteotomy: a study of long-term hard tissue stability.
    Wagner S; Reyneke JP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 11307221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictability of prebent advancement plates for use in maxillomandibular advancement surgery.
    Lye KW; Waite PD; Wang D; Sittitavornwong S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1625-9. PubMed ID: 18634950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in soft tissue thickness after Le Fort I osteotomy in different cleft types.
    Heliövaara A; Hukki J; Ranta R; Rintala A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 12387612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with isolated cleft palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Heliövaara A; Ranta R; Hukki J; Rintala A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 31(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 12361066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bone biological plate for stabilization of maxillary inferior repositioning.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Zerman N; Zorzan E; Politi M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2005 Apr; 54(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 15973236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The skeletal stability of one-piece Le Fort 1 osteotomy to advance the maxilla; Part 1. Stability resulting from non-bone grafted rigid fixation.
    Hoffman GR; Brennan PA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15121267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stability of maxillary surgical movement in unilateral cleft lip and palate with preceding alveolar bone grafting.
    Thongdee P; Samman N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Nov; 42(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 16241179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Hirano A; Suzuki H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jan; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11204674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion.
    Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of treatment modality for skeletal Class III malocclusion with labioversed upper incisors and/or protrusive maxilla: surgical movement and stability of rotational maxillary setback procedure.
    Baek SH; Kim K; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):2049-54. PubMed ID: 19881370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.
    Rachmiel A; Aizenbud D; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 16053864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Importance of soft tissue for skeletal stability in maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Baumann A; Sinko K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12498607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of titanium and resorbable copolymer fixation after Le Fort I maxillary impaction.
    Dhol WS; Reyneke JP; Tompson B; Sándor GK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 18617105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Daimaruya T; Imai Y; Kochi S; Tachi M; Takano-Yamamoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1480-6. PubMed ID: 20417011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of a LeFort I maxillary osteotomy.
    Semaan S; Goonewardene MS
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):964-73. PubMed ID: 16448239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Internal maxillary distraction with a new bimalar device.
    Kahn DM; Broujerdi J; Schendel SA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 18355590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Skeletal stability after inferior maxillary repositioning without interpositional graft.
    Santos SE; Moreira RW; de Moraes M; Asprino L; Araujo MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 22192387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. One-year postoperative stability of LeFort I osteotomies with biodegradable fixation: a retrospective analysis of skeletal relapse.
    Kiely KD; Wendfeldt KS; Johnson BE; Haskell BS; Edwards RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 16979488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.