201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12388481)
1. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality.
Kalra MK; Prasad S; Saini S; Blake MA; Varghese J; Halpern EF; Thrall JH; Rhea JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1101-6. PubMed ID: 12388481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of patient weight and cross-sectional dimensions with subjective image quality at standard dose abdominal CT.
Kalra MK; Maher MM; Prasad SR; Hayat MS; Blake MA; Varghese J; Halpern EF; Saini S
Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 14726640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality.
Prasad SR; Wittram C; Shepard JA; McLoud T; Rhea J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 12130452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients.
Kalra MK; Maher MM; Kamath RS; Horiuchi T; Toth TL; Halpern EF; Saini S
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):241-9. PubMed ID: 15454622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between combined automatic tube current modulation and fixed tube current technique in CT of abdomen and pelvis.
Lee S; Yoon SW; Yoo SM; Ji YG; Kim KA; Kim SH; Lee JT
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1101-6. PubMed ID: 21903869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of standard-dose vs low-dose attenuation correction CT on image quality and positron emission tomographic attenuation correction.
Krishnasetty V; Bonab AA; Fischman AJ; Halpern EF; Aquino SL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18359446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine chest and abdominal high-pitch CT: an alternative low dose protocol with preserved image quality.
Amacker NA; Mader C; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e392-7. PubMed ID: 22226852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality.
Guimarães LS; Fletcher JG; Harmsen WS; Yu L; Siddiki H; Melton Z; Huprich JE; Hough D; Hartman R; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):732-42. PubMed ID: 20959540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
Borgen L; Kalra MK; Laerum F; Hachette IW; Fredriksson CH; Sandborg M; Smedby O
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between low (3:1) and high (6:1) pitch for routine abdominal/pelvic imaging with multislice computed tomography.
Sahani D; Saini S; D'Souza RV; O'Neill MJ; Prasad SR; Kalra MK; Halpern EF; Mueller P
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 12702997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques.
Heneghan JP; McGuire KA; Leder RA; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi T; Nelson RC
Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):575-80. PubMed ID: 14526095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.
Nakayama Y; Awai K; Funama Y; Hatemura M; Imuta M; Nakaura T; Ryu D; Morishita S; Sultana S; Sato N; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):945-51. PubMed ID: 16237140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
