These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12388965)
1. Mood disturbance in pregnancy and the mode of delivery. Wu J; Viguera A; Riley L; Cohen L; Ecker J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):864-7. PubMed ID: 12388965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Mode of Delivery on Female Postpartum Sexual Functioning: Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery and Operative Vaginal Delivery vs. Cesarean Section. Barbara G; Pifarotti P; Facchin F; Cortinovis I; Dridi D; Ronchetti C; Calzolari L; Vercellini P J Sex Med; 2016 Mar; 13(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 26857530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations. Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Depressive symptoms, pain, and sexual dysfunction over the first year following vaginal or cesarean delivery: A prospective longitudinal study. Chang SR; Chen KH; Ho HN; Lai YH; Lin MI; Lee CN; Lin WA Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1433-44. PubMed ID: 26008134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal omentin-1 level, quality of life and marital satisfaction in relation to mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study. Parvanehvar S; Tehranian N; Kazemnejad A; Mozdarani H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):136. PubMed ID: 32122310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of psychosocial and biological parameters in women seeking for a caesarean section and women who are aiming for vaginal delivery: a cross-sectional study. Tuschy B; Berlit S; Stützer P; Lis S; Schmahl C; Baumgärtner U; Sütterlin M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Apr; 297(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 29344846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mode of delivery and postpartum depression: the role of patient preferences. Houston KA; Kaimal AJ; Nakagawa S; Gregorich SE; Yee LM; Kuppermann M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25218957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran. Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations? Bakhamees H; Hegazy E Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 19(3):693-704. PubMed ID: 18044297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence. Jangö H; Langhoff-Roos J; Rosthøj S; Sakse A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):733.e1-733.e13. PubMed ID: 26721778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women]. Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system. Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. Hobbs AJ; Mannion CA; McDonald SW; Brockway M; Tough SC BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():90. PubMed ID: 27118118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Multi-centric clinical study of trial of labor after cesarean section]. Yu L; Su CH; Wang XY; Gong JJ; Chen P; Du HM; Quan QH; Li LL; Chen DJ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):581-5. PubMed ID: 27561936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Gimovsky AC; Berghella V Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):361.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26928148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view. Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of epidural analgesia on cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates classified by the Ten Groups Classification System. Lucovnik M; Blajic I; Verdenik I; Mirkovic T; Stopar Pintaric T Int J Obstet Anesth; 2018 May; 34():37-41. PubMed ID: 29501538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The maternal childbirth experience more than a decade after delivery. Bossano CM; Townsend KM; Walton AC; Blomquist JL; Handa VL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):342.e1-342.e8. PubMed ID: 28455080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]