These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12390002)

  • 1. Ethnicity and skeletal Class III morphology: a pubertal growth analysis using thin-plate spline analysis.
    Alkhamrah B; Terada K; Yamaki M; Ali IM; Hanada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 12390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients.
    Deguchi T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9971929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spline analysis of the mandible in human subjects with class III malocclusion.
    Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
    Arch Oral Biol; 1997 May; 42(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 9233843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction.
    Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Paniagua B; Zhu H; Koerich L; De Clerck H
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 23886012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An estimation of craniofacial growth in the untreated Class III female with anterior crossbite.
    Miyajima K; McNamara JA; Sana M; Murata S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Oct; 112(4):425-34. PubMed ID: 9345155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial morphology and adolescent facial growth in Pierre Robin sequence.
    Suri S; Ross RB; Tompson BD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):763-74. PubMed ID: 20685531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.
    De Clerck H; Cevidanes L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 21055597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
    Yoon SS; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):720-8. PubMed ID: 16159349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance.
    Alhaija ES
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17315814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion.
    Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 19(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 9308254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing cervical spine and craniofacial morphology in Class II and Class III malocclusions: A geometric morphometric approach.
    Sandoval C; Díaz A; Manríquez G
    Cranio; 2024 Jul; 42(4):450-460. PubMed ID: 34623215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric findings in patients with Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome.
    Bindayel NA; Ullbro C; Suri L; Al-Farra E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 18617113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early craniofacial morphology and growth in children with unoperated isolated cleft palate.
    Hermann NV; Kreiborg S; Darvann TA; Jensen BL; Dahl E; Bolund S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Nov; 39(6):604-22. PubMed ID: 12401107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 86(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 6592976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.