121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12390563)
1. Improvements in methods of periodontal probing: comparison of relative attachment level data selected by outlier reduction protocols from Florida disc probe measurements.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Johnson NW
J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 29(8):679-87. PubMed ID: 12390563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Option-4 algorithm for Florida pocket depth probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific probeable crevice depth measurements.
Breen HJ; Rogers P; Johnson NW; Slaney R
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 26(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 10450811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
Ahmed N; Watts TL; Wilson RF
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 8783050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction and diagnosis of attachment loss by enhanced chemiluminescent assay of crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase levels.
Chapple IL; Garner I; Saxby MS; Moscrop H; Matthews JB
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 10100046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical attachment level measurements with and without the use of a stent by a computerized electronic probe.
Machion L; Andia DC; Nociti Júnior FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2007 Apr; 9(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 17506385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 2-year longitudinal study of elastase in human gingival crevicular fluid and periodontal attachment loss.
Eley BM; Cox SW
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Jul; 23(7):681-92. PubMed ID: 8841902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between gingivain/gingipain and bacterial dipeptidyl peptidase activity in gingival crevicular fluid and periodontal attachment loss in chronic periodontitis patients. A 2-year longitudinal study.
Eley BM; Cox SW
J Periodontol; 1996 Jul; 67(7):703-16. PubMed ID: 8832482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
