159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12391532)
1. [Patient evaluation of postoperative recovery. An evaluation of the QoR scores in 577 patients].
Eberhart LH; Greiner S; Geldner G; Wulf H
Anaesthesist; 2002 Jun; 51(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 12391532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric testing of the Chinese quality of recovery score.
Chan MT; Lo CC; Lok CK; Chan TW; Choi KC; Gin T
Anesth Analg; 2008 Oct; 107(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 18806027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.
Stark PA; Myles PS; Burke JA
Anesthesiology; 2013 Jun; 118(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 23411725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality in anesthesia.
Myles PS
Minerva Anestesiol; 2001 Apr; 67(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 11376524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spanish-language version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): preliminary validation.
Beattie PF; Nelson RM; Lis A
Phys Ther; 2007 Jun; 87(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 17442835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cross-validation of simple questioning methods to determine patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care].
Eberhart LH; Bothner U; Bündgen W; Celik I; Geldner G; Kranke P; Sauer D; Simon M; Werthwein K; Wulf H
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2004 Jul; 39(7):406-11. PubMed ID: 15273929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reliability and validity of the Anaesthesiological Questionnaire for electively operated patients].
Hüppe M; Beckhoff M; Klotz KF; Heinzinger M; Prüssmann M; Gerlach K; Ocker H; Schmucker P
Anaesthesist; 2003 Apr; 52(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 12715133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The German version of the Oxford Shoulder Score--cross-cultural adaptation and validation.
Huber W; Hofstaetter JG; Hanslik-Schnabel B; Posch M; Wurnig C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Oct; 124(8):531-6. PubMed ID: 15480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the functional recovery index for ambulatory surgery and anesthesia.
Wong J; Tong D; De Silva Y; Abrishami A; Chung F
Anesthesiology; 2009 Mar; 110(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 19212260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties in chronic neck pain and C1-2 fusion patients.
Bremerich FH; Grob D; Dvorak J; Mannion AF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):1018-27. PubMed ID: 18427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery.
Chazapis M; Walker EM; Rooms MA; Kamming D; Moonesinghe SR
Br J Anaesth; 2016 Feb; 116(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 26787793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.
Ertaş M; Siva A; Dalkara T; Uzuner N; Dora B; Inan L; Idiman F; Sarica Y; Selçuki D; Sirin H; Oğuzhanoğlu A; Irkeç C; Ozmenoğlu M; Ozbenli T; Oztürk M; Saip S; Neyal M; Zarifoğlu M;
Headache; 2004 Sep; 44(8):786-93. PubMed ID: 15330825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors associated with fast-track ineligibility after monitored anesthesia care in ambulatory surgery patients.
Twersky RS; Sapozhnikova S; Toure B
Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1421-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18420856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.
Myles PS; Hunt JO; Nightingale CE; Fletcher H; Beh T; Tanil D; Nagy A; Rubinstein A; Ponsford JL
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 9895071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of quality of recovery in 5672 patients after anaesthesia and surgery.
Myles PS; Reeves MD; Anderson H; Weeks AM
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Jun; 28(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 10853209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Perioperative monitoring of the course of anesthesia, the postanesthesia visit and inquiry of patient satisfaction. A prospective study of parameters in process and outcome quality in anesthesia].
Bothner U; Schwilk B; Steffen P; Eberhart LH; Becker U; Georgieff M
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1996 Dec; 31(10):608-14. PubMed ID: 9081417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
