These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12391785)

  • 1. Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination.
    McLaren IP; Mackintosh NJ
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Aug; 30(3):177-200. PubMed ID: 12391785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elemental representation and configural mappings: combining elemental and configural theories of associative learning.
    McLaren IP; Forrest CL; McLaren RP
    Learn Behav; 2012 Sep; 40(3):320-33. PubMed ID: 22927004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus generalization in two associative learning processes.
    van Osselaer SM; Janiszewski C; Cunha M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):626-38. PubMed ID: 15099131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of similarity and experience on discrimination learning: a nonassociative connectionist model of perceptual learning.
    Saksida LM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jul; 25(3):308-23. PubMed ID: 10423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning.
    Harris JA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):584-605. PubMed ID: 16802882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting peak shift on an artificial dimension: Effects of stimulus variability on generalisation.
    Livesey EJ; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):132-150. PubMed ID: 30803341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The representation of stimulus conjunction in theories of associative learning: A context-dependent added-elements model.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):185-204. PubMed ID: 32730078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.
    Pearce JM
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 May; 30(2):73-95. PubMed ID: 12141138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural and elemental processing in associative learning: commentary on Melchers, Shanks and Lachnit.
    Wagner AR; Vogel EH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 18164142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.
    Pearce JM
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Oct; 101(4):587-607. PubMed ID: 7984708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes.
    Melchers KG; Shanks DR; Lachnit H
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):413-27; discussion 451-3. PubMed ID: 18031954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further challenges to elemental and configural accounts of associative learning.
    Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):428-30. PubMed ID: 17988805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representation and discrimination on an artificial dimension.
    Suret M; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12623535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context-sensitive elemental theory.
    Wagner AR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 12623534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are some dimensions integral? Testing two hypotheses through causal learning experiments.
    Soto FA; Quintana GR; Pérez-Acosta AM; Ponce FP; Vogel EH
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():163-77. PubMed ID: 26163820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual difference in configural associative learning.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):325-335. PubMed ID: 27732046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symmetrical generalization decrements: configural stimulus processing in human contingency learning.
    Thorwart A; Lachnit H
    Learn Behav; 2009 Feb; 37(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 19122057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual learning by preschool children using stimuli with varying proportions of common elements.
    Espinet A; Almaraz J; Torres PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 1):935-42. PubMed ID: 10665028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.