These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12391789)

  • 21. The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue-selection effects.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 17176664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 12075980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.
    Stout SC; Miller RR
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):759-83. PubMed ID: 17638505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrospective revaluation and its neural circuit in rats.
    San-Galli A; Marchand AR; Decorte L; Di Scala G
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 223(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 21539862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Blake KL; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35143242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revisiting the role of within-compound associations in cue-interaction phenomena.
    Luque D; Flores A; Vadillo MA
    Learn Behav; 2013 Mar; 41(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 22753000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An elemental model of retrospective revaluation without within-compound associations.
    Connor PC; Lolordo VM; Trappenberg TP
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 23813103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ecco: An error correcting comparator theory.
    Ghirlanda S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Sep; 154():36-44. PubMed ID: 29524550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A combination of common and individual error terms is not needed to explain associative changes when cues with different training histories are conditioned in compound: A review of Rescorla's compound test procedure.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 30945928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retrospective revaluation and inhibitory associations: does perceptual learning modulate our perception of the contingencies between events?
    Graham S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1999 May; 52(2):159-85. PubMed ID: 10371872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Second-order retrospective revaluation in human contingency learning].
    Numata K; Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2009 Apr; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 19489431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Super-learning of causal judgements.
    Aitken MR; Larkin MJ; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Feb; 53(1):59-81. PubMed ID: 10718060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the type of judgement required modulate cue competition?
    Cobos PL; Caño A; López FJ; Luque JL; Almaraz J
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Aug; 53(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 11006718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Over-selectivity decreases with increased training: A role for within-compound associations.
    Reed P; Quigley M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102868. PubMed ID: 31220773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations.
    Wasserman EA; Berglan LR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 May; 51(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 9621838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the blocking of occasion setting.
    Alfaro F; Mallea J; Laborda MA; Cañete A; Miguez G
    Behav Processes; 2018 Sep; 154():52-59. PubMed ID: 29444454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning.
    Le Pelley ME; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 12623538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.