These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12392163)

  • 1. The collection of PM10 for toxicological investigation: comparisons between different collecting devices.
    Greenwell LL; Jones TP; Richards RJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2002 Nov; 79(3):251-73. PubMed ID: 12392163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field evaluation of particulate matter measurements using tapered element oscillating microbalance in a layer house.
    Li QF; Wang-Li L; Liu Z; Heber AJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Mar; 62(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 22482290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic biases in measured PM10 values with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved samplers at Owens Lake, California.
    Ono DM; Hardebeck E; Parker J; Cox BG
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Jul; 50(7):1144-56. PubMed ID: 10939208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The composition of PM10 as collected by a conventional TEOM, a modified TEOM and a Partisol gravimetric monitor at a kerbside site in the North East of England.
    Bulpitt S; Price M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):479-89. PubMed ID: 16779576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The physicochemical characterisation of microscopic airborne particles in south Wales: a review of the locations and methodologies.
    Jones T; Moreno T; BéruBé K; Richards R
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 360(1-3):43-59. PubMed ID: 16257436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 2. Analysis of the oxidative potential of particulate matter.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):73-144. PubMed ID: 21830497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas.
    Allen G; Sioutas C; Koutrakis P; Reiss R; Lurmann FW; Roberts PT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1997 Jun; 47(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 9180064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of chemical composition on the induction of DNA damage by urban airborne particulate matter.
    Gutiérrez-Castillo ME; Roubicek DA; Cebrián-García ME; De Vizcaya-Ruíz A; Sordo-Cedeño M; Ostrosky-Wegman P
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2006 Apr; 47(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 16355389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality-assured measurements of animal building emissions: particulate matter concentrations.
    Heber AJ; Lim TT; Ni JQ; Tao PC; Schmidt AM; Koziel JA; Hoff SJ; Jacobson LD; Zhang Y; Baughman GB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12):1642-8. PubMed ID: 17195483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PM25 measurements in ambient aerosol: comparison between Harvard impactor (HI) and the tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) system.
    Cyrys J; Dietrich G; Kreyling W; Tuch T; Heinrich J
    Sci Total Environ; 2001 Oct; 278(1-3):191-7. PubMed ID: 11669267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating particle exposure in the Mexico City metropolitan area.
    O'Neill MS; Loomis D; Torres Meza V; Retama A; Gold D
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002 Mar; 12(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 11965531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the RAMS continuous monitor for determination of PM2.5 mass including semi-volatile material in Philadelphia, PA.
    Pang Y; Eatough NL; Modey WK; Eatough DJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 12022695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Receptor modelling of airborne particulate matter in the vicinity of a major steelworks site.
    Taiwo AM; Beddows DC; Calzolai G; Harrison RM; Lucarelli F; Nava S; Shi Z; Valli G; Vecchi R
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():488-500. PubMed ID: 24875261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: Part II. Filter-based measurements of fine and coarse particulate matter mass and composition.
    Edgerton ES; Hartsell BE; Saylor RD; Jansen JJ; Hansen DA; Hidy GM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Oct; 55(10):1527-42. PubMed ID: 16295278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the correlations of ambient tapered element oscillating microbalance PM2.5 data and SHARP 5030 Federal Equivalent Method in Ontario: a multiple linear regression analysis.
    Sofowote U; Su Y; Bitzos MM; Munoz A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 24620408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elemental characterization of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in the town of Genoa (Italy).
    Ariola V; D'Alessandro A; Lucarelli F; Marcazzan G; Mazzei F; Nava S; Garcia-Orellana I; Prati P; Valli G; Vecchi R; Zucchiatti A
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jan; 62(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15982708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships of Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Air (RIOPA). Part I. Collection methods and descriptive analyses.
    Weisel CP; Zhang J; Turpin BJ; Morandi MT; Colome S; Stock TH; Spektor DM; Korn L; Winer AM; Kwon J; Meng QY; Zhang L; Harrington R; Liu W; Reff A; Lee JH; Alimokhtari S; Mohan K; Shendell D; Jones J; Farrar L; Maberti S; Fan T
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2005 Nov; (130 Pt 1):1-107; discussion 109-27. PubMed ID: 16454009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous determination of fine particulate matter mass in the Salt Lake City Environmental Monitoring project: a comparison of real-time and conventional TEOM monitor results.
    Long RW; Eatough NL; Eatough DJ; Meyer MB; Wilson WE
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Dec; 55(12):1839-46. PubMed ID: 16408688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory characterization of modified tapered element oscillating microbalance samplers.
    Schwab JJ; Hogrefe O; Demerjian KL; Ambs JL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Oct; 54(10):1254-63. PubMed ID: 15540578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.