These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12394921)

  • 1. Load transfer mechanisms in cylindrical interbody cage constructs.
    Palm WJ; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(19):2101-7. PubMed ID: 12394921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body.
    Adam C; Pearcy M; McCombe P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 May; 18(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 12689775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.
    Tsantrizos A; Baramki HG; Zeidman S; Steffen T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1899-907. PubMed ID: 10908932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.
    Kim Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2558-68. PubMed ID: 17978654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Kleemann R; Duda G; Wise DL; Trantolo DJ; Lewandrowski KU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of various footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion devices.
    Faizan A; Kiapour A; Kiapour AM; Goel VK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):E118-27. PubMed ID: 24869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
    Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of the effects of pedicle screw fixation nut loosening on lumbar interbody fusion based on the elasto-plateau plasticity of bone characteristics.
    Kim Y; Kim TW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 20139810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Analysis of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: Based on a Validated Finite Element Model.
    Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1120-e1129. PubMed ID: 29609081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kumar N; Judith MR; Kumar A; Mishra V; Robert MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):1731-5. PubMed ID: 16094274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and finite-element evaluation of a versatile assembled lumbar interbody fusion cage.
    Ding JY; Qian S; Wan L; Huang B; Wang LG; Zhou Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 20140621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis.
    Xu H; Ju W; Xu N; Zhang X; Zhu X; Zhu L; Qian X; Wen F; Wu W; Jiang F
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Dec; 73(2 Suppl Operative):ons198-205; discussion ons205. PubMed ID: 23632763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.
    Polikeit A; Ferguson SJ; Nolte LP; Orr TE
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Aug; 12(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 12955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis and cadaveric cinematic analysis of fixation options for anteriorly implanted trabecular metal interbody cages.
    Berjano P; Blanco JF; Rendon D; Villafañe JH; Pescador D; Atienza CM
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 7():918-23. PubMed ID: 26452680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Polikeit A; Ferguson SJ; Nolte LP; Orr TE
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 12783287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of cage height on the flexibility and load sharing of lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation: a biomechanical study.
    Du L; Sun XJ; Zhou TJ; Li YC; Chen C; Zhao CQ; Zhang K; Zhao J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29162074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Schleicher P; Gerlach R; Schär B; Cain CM; Achatz W; Pflugmacher R; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1757-65. PubMed ID: 18841399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.