These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues. Gottlob LR Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sources of top-down control in visual search. Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impaired search for orientation but not color in hemi-spatial neglect. Wilkinson D; Ko P; Milberg W; McGlinchey R Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 18387532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus control during conditional discrimination. Yarczower M J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 5142389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia). Lea SE; Wills AJ; Leaver LA; Ryan CM; Bryant CM; Millar L J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):406-20. PubMed ID: 19929109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons. Sutton JE; Roberts WA J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of the velocity of movement of visual stimuli by pigeons? Hodos W; Smith L; Bonbright JC J Exp Anal Behav; 1976 Mar; 25(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 932616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Kenner N; Hyle M; Vasan N Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1411-26. PubMed ID: 15066400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avian detection and identification of perceptual organization in random noise. Cook RG; Goto K; Brooks DI Behav Processes; 2005 Apr; 69(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 15795072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]