These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers. Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evidence of complementary afterimages in the pigeon. Williams JL J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 May; 21(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 4838197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons. Grant DS Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16481126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter. Shettleworth SJ; Plowright CM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 1619391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Some determiners of attention. Johnson DF; Cumming WW J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 5645872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Interval timing with gaps and distracters: evaluation of the ambiguity, switch, and time-sharing hypotheses. Buhusi CV; Meck WH J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16834500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers. Mazur JE Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of ethanol on working memory and attention in pigeons. Dayer CA; Baron S; Light KE; Wenger GR J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2000 May; 293(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 10773028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement. Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons. Lattal KA; Doepke KJ J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pigeons make errors as a result of interval timing in a visual, but not a visual-spatial, midsession reversal task. McMillan N; Roberts WA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23066981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Temporal integration as a function of signal and gap intensity in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia). Buhusi CV; Sasaki A; Meck WH J Comp Psychol; 2002 Dec; 116(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 12539934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]