These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12395499)

  • 41. Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.
    DeLong RE; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 7288370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pigeons may not use dual coding in the radial maze analog task.
    DiGian KA; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 17620025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: implications of the scalar property.
    Leak TM; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Jan; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 7844504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evidence of complementary afterimages in the pigeon.
    Williams JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 May; 21(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 4838197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16481126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter.
    Shettleworth SJ; Plowright CM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 1619391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Some determiners of attention.
    Johnson DF; Cumming WW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 5645872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interval timing with gaps and distracters: evaluation of the ambiguity, switch, and time-sharing hypotheses.
    Buhusi CV; Meck WH
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16834500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Memory mechanisms in pigeons: evidence of base-rate neglect.
    Zentall TR; Clement TS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Jan; 28(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11868229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of ethanol on working memory and attention in pigeons.
    Dayer CA; Baron S; Light KE; Wenger GR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2000 May; 293(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 10773028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons.
    Lattal KA; Doepke KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pigeons make errors as a result of interval timing in a visual, but not a visual-spatial, midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Roberts WA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23066981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Timing in response-initiated fixed intervals.
    Fox AE; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):375-92. PubMed ID: 25533195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Temporal integration as a function of signal and gap intensity in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Buhusi CV; Sasaki A; Meck WH
    J Comp Psychol; 2002 Dec; 116(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 12539934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.