These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12395546)
1. A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring. Dolan CV; van der Maas HL; Molenaar PC Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):304-23. PubMed ID: 12395546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: methods and packages. Cousineau D; Brown S; Heathcote A Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):742-56. PubMed ID: 15641420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. QMPE: estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound. Heathcote A; Brown S; Cousineau D Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):277-90. PubMed ID: 15354694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fitting wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: an example using functions for the S-PLUS package. Heathcote A Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):678-94. PubMed ID: 15641415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis. Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 19815782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Slope estimation for informatively right censored longitudinal data modelling the number of observations using geometric and Poisson distributions: application to renal transplant cohort. Jaffa MA; Lipsitz S; Woolson RF Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):819-35. PubMed ID: 22143404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies. Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-Gaussian Distributional Analyses of Reaction Times (RT): Improvements that Increase Efficacy of RT Tasks for Describing Cognitive Processes. Osmon DC; Kazakov D; Santos O; Kassel MT Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Sep; 28(3):359-376. PubMed ID: 30178182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling visual search using three-parameter probability functions in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. Lin YS; Heinke D; Humphreys GW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):985-1010. PubMed ID: 25678272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the Vincentizing method of forming group-level response time distributions. Rouder JN; Speckman PL Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 15376789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times. Schwarz W Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Nov; 33(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 11816448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum likelihood estimation in survival studies under progressive interval censoring with random removals. Xiang L; Tse SK J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):981-91. PubMed ID: 16279356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model-based learning using a mixture of mixtures of Gaussian and uniform distributions. Browne RP; McNicholas PD; Sparling MD IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2012 Apr; 34(4):814-7. PubMed ID: 22383342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regression models for the restricted residual mean life for right-censored and left-truncated data. Cortese G; Holmboe SA; Scheike TH Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1803-1822. PubMed ID: 28106926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulating survival data with predefined censoring rates for proportional hazards models. Wan F Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):838-854. PubMed ID: 27873333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. Matzke D; Dolan CV; Logan GD; Brown SD; Wagenmakers EJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1047-73. PubMed ID: 23163766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A semiparametric mixture cure survival model for left-truncated and right-censored data. Chen CM; Shen PS; Wei JC; Lin L Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):270-290. PubMed ID: 27878856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing estimation approaches for the illness-death model under left truncation and right censoring. Vakulenko-Lagun B; Mandel M Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1533-48. PubMed ID: 26553433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inference of finite mixture models and the effect of binning. Geissen EM; Hasenauer J; Radde NE Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2019 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 31348764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are model parameters linked to processing stages? An empirical investigation for the ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, and EZ diffusion models. Rieger T; Miller J Psychol Res; 2020 Sep; 84(6):1683-1699. PubMed ID: 30949790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]