These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12395809)

  • 1. The believability of children and their interviewers' hearsay testimony: when less is more.
    Warren AR; Nunez N; Keeney JM; Buck JA; Smith B
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):846-57. PubMed ID: 12395809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases.
    Redlich AD; Myers JE; Goodman GS; Qin J
    Child Maltreat; 2002 Nov; 7(4):312-28. PubMed ID: 12408244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When does quality count?: Perceptions of hearsay testimony about child sexual abuse interviews.
    Buck JA; Warrren AR; Brigham JC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):599-621. PubMed ID: 15732649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Sanchez RP; Sego SA
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Jun; 21(3):299-325. PubMed ID: 9209160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of interviewer behavior on accuracy of children's responses.
    Sparling J; Wilder DA; Kondash J; Boyle M; Compton M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 21941387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure.
    Lewy J; Cyr M; Dion J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 May; 43():112-22. PubMed ID: 25816755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
    Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic interviewers' perceptions of the utility of mock interviews with trained actors as a training tool for child interviewing.
    Lawrie M; Brubacher SP; Powell MB; Boud D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2020 Aug; 106():104553. PubMed ID: 32464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Tobey AE; Batterman-Faunce JM; Orcutt H; Thomas S; Shapiro C; Sachsenmaier T
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Apr; 22(2):165-203. PubMed ID: 9566121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How interviewers' nonverbal behaviors can affect children's perceptions and suggestibility.
    Almerigogna J; Ost J; Akehurst L; Fluck M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 18316091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews.
    Lamb ME; Garretson ME
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 12733419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of interviewer familiarity and supportiveness on children's recall across repeated interviews.
    Brubacher SP; Poole DA; Dickinson JJ; La Rooy D; Szojka ZA; Powell MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 43(6):507-516. PubMed ID: 31448927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Influence of First-Hand Testimony and Hearsay on Children's Belief in the Improbable.
    Lane JD; Ronfard S; El-Sherif D
    Child Dev; 2018 Jul; 89(4):1133-1140. PubMed ID: 28436575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adults' judgments of children's coached reports.
    Talwar V; Lee K; Bala N; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):561-70. PubMed ID: 16941237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's belief in purported events: When claims reference hearsay, books, or the internet.
    Danovitch JH; Lane JD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 May; 193():104808. PubMed ID: 32062164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A missing link in suggestibility research: what is known about the behavior of field interviewers in unstructured interviews with young children?
    Gilstrap LL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15053699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.
    Devenport JL; Stinson V; Cutler BL; Kravitz DA
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1042-54. PubMed ID: 12558212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Interviewer Support on Children's Memory and Suggestibility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Experimental Research.
    Saywitz KJ; Wells CR; Larson RP; Hobbs SD
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2019 Jan; 20(1):22-39. PubMed ID: 30803408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.