These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12396648)

  • 1. Level of processing and the process-dissociation procedure: elusiveness of null effects on estimates of automatic retrieval.
    Richardson-Klavehn A; Gardiner JM; Ramponi C
    Memory; 2002; 10(5-6):349-64. PubMed ID: 12396648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Awareness of remembering achieved through automatic and conscious processes in multiple sclerosis.
    Scarrabelotti M; Carroll M
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Nov; 38(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 9853096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlled recall of verbal material in temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Hudson JM; Flowers KA; Roberts KA
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Sep; 3(Pt 2):169-79. PubMed ID: 19338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic memory processes in normal ageing and Alzheimer's disease.
    Hudson JM
    Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 18387563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in intentional retrieval during inclusion and exclusion tasks.
    De Houwer J
    Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):379-400. PubMed ID: 9231149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A paradoxical dissociation in the effects of midazolam on recollection and automatic processes in the process dissociation procedure.
    Mintzer MZ; Griffiths RR; Hirshman E
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 12762176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Self-reference effect on automatic and intentional memory].
    Horiuchi T; Fujita T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Jun; 72(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 11544913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring automatic retrieval: a comparison of implicit memory, process dissociation, and speeded response procedures.
    Horton KD; Wilson DE; Vonk J; Kirby SL; Nielsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jul; 119(3):235-63. PubMed ID: 15939025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Stochastic relations between conscious and automatic memory processes: an expansion of the process-dissociation procedure].
    Krüger T; Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(2):220-45. PubMed ID: 9487779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrograde facilitation of memory by triazolam: effects on automatic processes.
    Fillmore MT; Kelly TH; Rush CR; Hays L
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Nov; 158(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 11713622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in the process dissociation procedure: a word fragment completion study.
    Russo R; Cullis AM; Parkin AJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):617-32. PubMed ID: 9701954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit retrieval processes in cued recall: implications for aging effects in memory.
    Friedman D; Snodgrass JG; Ritter W
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Dec; 16(6):921-38. PubMed ID: 7890826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval processing: effects of consistent versus inconsistent retrieval demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1531-44. PubMed ID: 16989553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitation and interference in indirect/implicit memory tests and in the process dissociation paradigm: the letter insertion and the letter deletion tasks.
    Reingold EM
    Conscious Cogn; 1995 Dec; 4(4):459-82. PubMed ID: 8750419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dissociation between implicit and explicit verbal memory in left temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Del Vecchio N; Liporace J; Nei M; Sperling M; Tracy J
    Epilepsia; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1124-33. PubMed ID: 15329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.